XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 16:59, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kjsco$3rq66$24@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-17 16:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kh0vt$2tajo$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-17 00:30, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> who weaponize her car.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?   
   >>>>>>>>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a   
   man   
   >>>>>>>>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And there was no "stomping".   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   >>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It jerked.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The officer seems to have jerked in his cellphone video...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...but that doesn't prove that he was struck.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The other videos show he was hit.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No video shows it. Not one.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Moving himself quickly out of the way could produce such a jerk.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from   
   him..   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Well she's a shitty driver then. Besides she was making a   
   >>>>>>> u turn on a one way street. You defended her by saying she   
   >>>>>>> didn't know it was a one way street. So not only is she a   
   >>>>>>> shitty driver she shouldn't even be driving at all.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> None of that changes that she was steering away from him.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She still hit him   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That is, as yet, unproven.   
   >>>   
   >>> And you can prove otherwise.   
   >>   
   >> I don't have to prove it, because it's not my claim that he was hit.   
   >   
   > And away he runs.   
      
   Nope. I'm pointing out that the initial claim is that he was it.   
      
   And no one has provided any actual evidence of contact between him and   
   the vehicle.   
      
   >>   
   >> It's your claim and it's based on no actual evidence at all.   
   >   
   > I saw what I saw.   
      
   But won't show us where you claim you saw it.   
      
   Got it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)