Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,508 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: A Department Of Homeland Security (D    |
|    19 Jan 26 16:31:54    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kmdib$nduj$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-17 16:22, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10kh5an$2tnfv$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > > uh@nope.com says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-17 15:13, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kh3gs$2tn8q$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-15 16:36, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>       > >>>>>>>>> It wasn't empty and if you call that a u turn then that       > >>>>>>>>> explains why Canadians are such bad drivers.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> There was no "crowd" for her to have been aiming at.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> Just that one agent.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Not in the direction she was intending to drive off he wasn't.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Why was she turning around in the mddle of the road?       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Because she originally intended to go back the way she'd come...       > >>>>>       > >>>>> She couldn't just go around the block? Oh you're reading       > >>>>> minds again?       > >>>>       > >>>> No. There was clearly an ICE operation going on in front of her and she       > >>>> wanted to IMMEDIATELY go back the other way to avoid it.       > >>>       > >>> Bull, her wife shows they knew where they were and why.       > >>       > >> How is that?       > >       > > You deny what was in the video.       >       > What part have I denied?       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>> That meant turning around.       > >>>       > >>> On a one way street? Are you reading minds again? You know       > >>> what she was thinking?       > >>>>       > >>>> Then she realize it was a one way street so she COULDN'T go back that       way.       > >>>       > >>> She already knew it was a one way street.       > >>       > >> Now you're a mindreader!       > >       > > If she didn't then she shouldn't be driving.       >       > So anyone who ever makes a mistake while driving should lose their       > license, is that your position?       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> ...but realized that she couldn't.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> Not on a crowded road. Dumb bitch.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> The PP was alluding to "Other people in her path, you fucking       moron."       > >>>>>>>> ASIDE from that "agent".       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> No one else was in her path.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Exactly!       > >>>>>       > >>>>> So shut up about it then.       > >>>>       > >>>> I'm not the one who made up the bullshit that she need to be shot       > >>>> because she might encounter someone in the street at some undetermined       > >>>> time in the future, sunshine.       > >>>       > >>> No one did. You made that shit up.       > >>       > >> That's precisely what the loser was suggesting:       > >       > > Nope.       >       > Yup.       >       > >>       > >> The agent need to shoot her because she might have hit someone else at       > >> some time in the undetermined future:       > >       > > Nope. That's your take.       >       > That is his literal statement.       >       > >>       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> There were no such others for whom the "agent" could have been       acting in       > >>>>>>>> defense.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Just for himself.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Which ended once he was beside the vehicle not in front of it.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> So? He was still doing the right thing. Get over it.       > >>>>       > >>>> No. He absolutely was not. By the policies of his agency he was not.       > >>>       > >>> Fuck policies. Self defense.       > >>       > >> The policy says it isn't self-defense if he could have gotten out of the       > >> way...       > >>       > >       > > POLICY!       >       > Yes.       >       > >       > >       > >> ...which he absolutely could have with a single step.       > >       > > You weren't there.       >       > I can see where he was when the vehicle started moving forward.       >       > That IS in the videos.       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> 6. Recent Surge in Attacks on Law Enforcement (2025)       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report released in late       2025       > >>>>>>>>>>> highlighted a 1,300% increase in vehicle attacks specifically       targeting ICE       > >>>>>>>>>>> officers.       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> Homestead, FL (Sept 2024): A driver reversed his car into an ICE       officer       > >>>>>>>>>>> during a traffic stop, nearly crushing him, before ramming       multiple vehicles       > >>>>>>>>>>> to escape.       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> Chicago, IL (Oct 2024): A suspect rammed CBP vehicles and       attempted to flee       > >>>>>>>>>>> before being stopped by a PIT maneuver.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> This wasn't an "attack". This was a woman in the middle of a       3-point       > >>>>>>>>>> turn who was startled when a masked man came up and grabbed her       door.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> You said it was a U turn? So you really don't know.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> I really do know, because I've watched the videos.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> So was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn? Why was she doing it       > >>>>>>> there? Why didn't she she drive forward?       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> I think it was because she started to turn around to go back the way       > >>>>>> she'd come, before realizing it was a one way street, and she had to       > >>>>>> then change back to facing the correct way.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> "you think" therein lies the problem. She should have       > >>>>> already known it was a one way street.       > >>>>       > >>>> People in stressful situations make mistakes.       > >>>       > >>> She made it stressful by being there.       > >>       > >> She drove up a road and found an ICE operation.       > >       > > She knew it was there.       > >>       > >> These days, that's stressful for people.       > >       > > Not to people who are paid to agitate.       >       > Oh, you have proof that she was "paid", do you?       >       > How about just any actual evidence?       >       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> And still: the "officer" who you claim was hit could have avoided       even       > >>>>>>>>>> the chance of contact by stepping to the right once.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> She could still be alive if she didn't try ti interfere       > >>>>>>>>> with Federal Law Enforcement.       > >>>>>>>> There is no evidence that she did so.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Plenty. The video of her bitch wife shows it.       > >>>>>> The video OF the wife...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> ...or the video TAKEN by the wife...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> ...and what does it show?       > >>>>>       > >>>>> Intent and the fact that they did know who the agents       > >>>>> were.       > >>>>       > >>>> Which has nothing to do with whether she intended to hit the agent...       > >>>       > >>> It sure knocks a lot of your lies apart.       > >>       > >> What "lies" would those be?       > >       > > You have contradicted yourself a bunch in the last couple       > > days.       >       > What contradictions would those be?       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>> ...because her actions clearly don't match that intent.       > >>>       > >>> So the wife didn't know what she was dong?       > >>       > >> Explain how it's relevant.       > >       > > It prove they knew who the agents were and that they were       > > there to agitate.       > >>       >              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca