XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10kmcpj$nduj$18@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-19 14:48, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kmbtj$n7db$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-19 14:35, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10km9i9$nduj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-19 04:25, NoBody wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:16:03 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 04:39, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:47:25 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700, Skeeter says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.
> >>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her
right...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ...and running RIGHT into him, hard.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope. It shows the phone suddenly moving, but that proves nothing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are other videos that showed what happened. Why are there only
> >>>>> two idiots here who can't admit she hit the agent?
> >>>>
> >>>> Why can't you show a single example where the actual contact is shown?
> >>>
> >>> Why are you inclined to defend a domestic terrorist?
> >>
> >> Bootstrapping.
> >>
> >> You can only call her a "terrorist" by claiming she acted with malicious
> >> intent, and then you can claim she had malicious intent because she was
> >> a "terrorist"
> >
> >
> > Her wife showed malicious intent. We been through this
> > already.
> Videoing is "malicious intent" now?
Taunting and daring ICE to do something. You continently
left that part out.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
