XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kmchf$nduj$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 14:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kma5n$nduj$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-18 16:48, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kjsu0$3rq66$33@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they   
   standing on?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended   
   to travel?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the   
   goalposts, as usual, with   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN   
   and came back at the   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and   
   shoot her again.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an   
   "officer"...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future   
   "attacks".   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have   
   gone to its left   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels   
   turned all   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right   
   move   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> You never drove on ice.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned  to drive.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Liar.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family   
   station   
   > >>>>>>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> And I should believe that why?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I don't care whether you believe it.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Translation: I lied.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> So you don't know basic physics.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your   
   mention   
   > >>>>>>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> More proof you don't know shit.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know   
   > >>>>> shit about it.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> But it failed to show that, so...   
   > >>>   
   > >>> That you don't know shit about it? I agree.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause   
   the   
   > >>>>>>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the   
   right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> How do you know?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Google "Renee good vehicle".   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Read the Wikipedia article.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Done.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Wikipedia = LOL   
   > >>   
   > >> There are sources AT wikipedia, doofus.   
   > >   
   > > That can be changed and edited.   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > Dude, this is utterly stupid of you.   
   >   
   > Everyone can see in the videos and in the images taken after the crash,   
   > that Renee Good's vehicle was a Honda.   
   >   
   > Honda doesn't make any RWD cars currently, and the RWD cars they did   
   > make in the past (S2000, NSX) could never be mistaken for the Honda   
   > Pilot SUV that Renee Good was driving.   
   >   
   > I mean, it's obvious you're not very bright, but you don't have to   
   > highlight it ALL the time.   
      
   Why was she turning around on a one way street?   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> You had to Google it.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)