XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kmd4m$n7db$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 14:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kmc75$nduj$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-19 14:38, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kma0i$nduj$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > >>> says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-18 16:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kjrqc$3rq66$17@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10kjpuf$3rq66$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kh336$2tn8q$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:29, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His: tell us of his training. Tell us what HIS training   
   was when he was about   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be run over by a domestic insurrectionist terrorist,   
   who was blocking him   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his fellow federal agents, from performing his/their   
   duties as ICE agents.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought you'd never ask!   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Chapter 1: General Guidelines   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WHOSE "guidelines?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Customs and Border Patrol's "Use of Force Policy".   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> All go out the window when someone is trying to run you   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> over.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> No. That is exactly when the policy comes into play.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Fuck the policy? You are just looking for an excuse to   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> hate.   
   > >>>>>>>>>> The policy exists to protect both law enforcement and citizens.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> He violated that policy to CREATE a threat.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> So you do admit it exists.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Admit what: that a policy exists which he violated?   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving   
   vehicles.   
   > >>>>>>>> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle   
   unless:   
   > >>>>>>>> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another   
   person   
   > >>>>>>>> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the   
   vehicle is   
   > >>>>>>>> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious   
   physical   
   > >>>>>>>> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   > >>>>>>>> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the   
   path   
   > >>>>>>>> of the vehicle.'   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Read that last part until you get it:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to   
   exist,   
   > >>>>>>>> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Admit we don't do court here like you do in commie   
   > >>>>>>> KKKanada. The jury will also look at the things that   
   > >>>>>>> happened and the reaction and realize that he was self   
   > >>>>>>> defending. Happens a lot.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Not when the see he could simply have stepped out of the way.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Nope. Reread what I wrote.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Sure.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Done.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> He could still have just kept walking and never been in a position to be   
   > >>>> struck  at all.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> And she could have just kept driving and she would be   
   > >>> alive today.   
   > >>   
   > >> She attempted to just drive away...   
   > >   
   > > By making a 3 point turn?   
   >   
   > At first, yes.   
   >   
   First of what?   
   > >>   
   > >> ...and Jonathan Ross decided to stop walking while he was still   
   > >> potentially in her path and was drawing his weapon before the car even   
   > >> started moving forward.   
   > >   
   > > She was impeding them.   
   > You don't get to draw your weapon on someone for "impeding" even if she   
   > was...   
      
   Yes you do if you feel threatened.   
   >   
   > ...which is funny because she was waving ICE vehicles past her.   
      
   Nope. You said she didn't know who they were.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)