XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-19 15:31, Skeeter wrote:   
      
   >>>>>> No. There was clearly an ICE operation going on in front of her and she   
   >>>>>> wanted to IMMEDIATELY go back the other way to avoid it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Bull, her wife shows they knew where they were and why.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> How is that?   
   >>>   
   >>> You deny what was in the video.   
   >>   
   >> What part have I denied?   
      
   Note: no answer.   
      
   >>>>>> That meant turning around.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On a one way street? Are you reading minds again? You know   
   >>>>> what she was thinking?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Then she realize it was a one way street so she COULDN'T go back that   
   way.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She already knew it was a one way street.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Now you're a mindreader!   
   >>>   
   >>> If she didn't then she shouldn't be driving.   
   >>   
   >> So anyone who ever makes a mistake while driving should lose their   
   >> license, is that your position?   
      
   Note: no answer.   
      
   >>>>>>>> ...but realized that she couldn't.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Not on a crowded road. Dumb bitch.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The PP was alluding to "Other people in her path, you fucking   
   moron."   
   >>>>>>>>>> ASIDE from that "agent".   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> No one else was in her path.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Exactly!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So shut up about it then.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I'm not the one who made up the bullshit that she need to be shot   
   >>>>>> because she might encounter someone in the street at some undetermined   
   >>>>>> time in the future, sunshine.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No one did. You made that shit up.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's precisely what the loser was suggesting:   
   >>>   
   >>> Nope.   
   >>   
   >> Yup.   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The agent need to shoot her because she might have hit someone else at   
   >>>> some time in the undetermined future:   
   >>>   
   >>> Nope. That's your take.   
   >>   
   >> That is his literal statement.   
      
   Note: no answer.   
      
   >>>>>>>>>> There were no such others for whom the "agent" could have been   
   acting in   
   >>>>>>>>>> defense.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Just for himself.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Which ended once he was beside the vehicle not in front of it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So? He was still doing the right thing. Get over it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No. He absolutely was not. By the policies of his agency he was not.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Fuck policies. Self defense.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The policy says it isn't self-defense if he could have gotten out of the   
   >>>> way...   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> POLICY!   
   >>   
   >> Yes.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> ...which he absolutely could have with a single step.   
   >>>   
   >>> You weren't there.   
   >>   
   >> I can see where he was when the vehicle started moving forward.   
   >>   
   >> That IS in the videos.   
      
   Note: no answer.   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. Recent Surge in Attacks on Law Enforcement (2025)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report released in late   
   2025   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> highlighted a 1,300% increase in vehicle attacks specifically   
   targeting ICE   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> officers.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Homestead, FL (Sept 2024): A driver reversed his car into an ICE   
   officer   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> during a traffic stop, nearly crushing him, before ramming   
   multiple vehicles   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> to escape.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chicago, IL (Oct 2024): A suspect rammed CBP vehicles and   
   attempted to flee   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> before being stopped by a PIT maneuver.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> This wasn't an "attack". This was a woman in the middle of a   
   3-point   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> turn who was startled when a masked man came up and grabbed her   
   door.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You said it was a U turn? So you really don't know.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I really do know, because I've watched the videos.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> So was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn? Why was she doing it   
   >>>>>>>>> there? Why didn't she she drive forward?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I think it was because she started to turn around to go back the way   
   >>>>>>>> she'd come, before realizing it was a one way street, and she had to   
   >>>>>>>> then change back to facing the correct way.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "you think" therein lies the problem. She should have   
   >>>>>>> already known it was a one way street.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> People in stressful situations make mistakes.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She made it stressful by being there.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> She drove up a road and found an ICE operation.   
   >>>   
   >>> She knew it was there.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> These days, that's stressful for people.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not to people who are paid to agitate.   
   >>   
   >> Oh, you have proof that she was "paid", do you?   
   >>   
   >> How about just any actual evidence?   
      
   Note: no answer.   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>> And still: the "officer" who you claim was hit could have avoided   
   even   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the chance of contact by stepping to the right once.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> She could still be alive if she didn't try ti interfere   
   >>>>>>>>>>> with Federal Law Enforcement.   
   >>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that she did so.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Plenty. The video of her bitch wife shows it.   
   >>>>>>>> The video OF the wife...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> ...or the video TAKEN by the wife...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> ...and what does it show?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Intent and the fact that they did know who the agents   
   >>>>>>> were.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Which has nothing to do with whether she intended to hit the agent...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It sure knocks a lot of your lies apart.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What "lies" would those be?   
   >>>   
   >>> You have contradicted yourself a bunch in the last couple   
   >>> days.   
   >>   
   >> What contradictions would those be?   
      
   Note: no answer.   
      
   >>>>>> ...because her actions clearly don't match that intent.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So the wife didn't know what she was dong?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Explain how it's relevant.   
   >>>   
   >>> It prove they knew who the agents were and that they were   
   >>> there to agitate.   
   >>>>   
   >>   
   >> No... ...it really doesn't.   
      
   Note: no answer.   
      
   >>>>>>>> How does waving a vehicle through square with your claim she was   
   >>>>>>>> "interfering"?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You saw the video or did you ignore it?   
   >>>>>> Answer the question.   
   >>>> Show me the video you claim shows she was "interfering".   
   >>>   
   >>> I never said she was interfering you moron.   
   >> Your answer implies you did.   
   >>   
   >> You said "impeding" in another reply.   
   >>   
   >> Are you retracting them both.   
   >>   
   >> Oh and here's a hint:   
   >>   
   >> You aren't allowed to be shot for EITHER anyway.   
   >   
   > Parts that will relevant in court.   
      
   Note: not an actual rebuttal of what was stated.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)