Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,525 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot.    |
|    19 Jan 26 16:00:11    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-19 15:45, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kmchf$nduj$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-19 14:41, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10kma5n$nduj$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-18 16:48, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kjsu0$3rq66$33@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they       standing on?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended       to travel?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the       goalposts, as usual, with       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN       and came back at the       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and       shoot her again.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an       "officer"...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future       "attacks".       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have       gone to its left       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels       turned all       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right       move       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> You never drove on ice.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned to drive.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Liar.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family       station       >>>>>>>>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> And I should believe that why?       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> I don't care whether you believe it.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Translation: I lied.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.       >>>>>>>>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> So you don't know basic physics.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your       mention       >>>>>>>>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> More proof you don't know shit.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know       >>>>>>> shit about it.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> But it failed to show that, so...       >>>>>       >>>>> That you don't know shit about it? I agree.       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause       the       >>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the       right.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> How do you know?       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Google "Renee good vehicle".       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Read the Wikipedia article.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Done.       >>>>>       >>>>> Wikipedia = LOL       >>>>       >>>> There are sources AT wikipedia, doofus.       >>>       >>> That can be changed and edited.       >>       >> |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca