home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,525 of 997,123   
   Alan to Skeeter   
   Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot.   
   19 Jan 26 16:00:11   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-19 15:45, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kmchf$nduj$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-19 14:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kma5n$nduj$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-18 16:48, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kjsu0$3rq66$33@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they   
   standing on?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended   
   to travel?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the   
   goalposts, as usual, with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN   
   and came back at the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and   
   shoot her again.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an   
   "officer"...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future   
   "attacks".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have   
   gone to its left   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels   
   turned all   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right   
   move   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> You never drove on ice.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned  to drive.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Liar.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family   
   station   
   >>>>>>>>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> And I should believe that why?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I don't care whether you believe it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Translation: I lied.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> So you don't know basic physics.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your   
   mention   
   >>>>>>>>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> More proof you don't know shit.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know   
   >>>>>>> shit about it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But it failed to show that, so...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> That you don't know shit about it? I agree.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause   
   the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the   
   right.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> How do you know?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Google "Renee good vehicle".   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Read the Wikipedia article.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Done.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Wikipedia = LOL   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There are sources AT wikipedia, doofus.   
   >>>   
   >>> That can be changed and edited.   
   >>   
   >>    
   >>   
   >> Dude, this is utterly stupid of you.   
   >>   
   >> Everyone can see in the videos and in the images taken after the crash,   
   >> that Renee Good's vehicle was a Honda.   
   >>   
   >> Honda doesn't make any RWD cars currently, and the RWD cars they did   
   >> make in the past (S2000, NSX) could never be mistaken for the Honda   
   >> Pilot SUV that Renee Good was driving.   
   >>   
   >> I mean, it's obvious you're not very bright, but you don't have to   
   >> highlight it ALL the time.   
   >   
   > Why was she turning around on a one way street?   
      
   And ICE operation in front of her blocking the road.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca