XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-19 15:49, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kmd4m$n7db$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-19 14:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kmc75$nduj$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-19 14:38, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kma0i$nduj$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   >>>>> says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 16:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kjrqc$3rq66$17@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kjpuf$3rq66$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kh336$2tn8q$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:29, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His: tell us of his training. Tell us what HIS training   
   was when he was about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be run over by a domestic insurrectionist terrorist,   
   who was blocking him   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his fellow federal agents, from performing his/their   
   duties as ICE agents.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought you'd never ask!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Chapter 1: General Guidelines   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WHOSE "guidelines?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Customs and Border Patrol's "Use of Force Policy".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All go out the window when someone is trying to run you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. That is exactly when the policy comes into play.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck the policy? You are just looking for an excuse to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> hate.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The policy exists to protect both law enforcement and citizens.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> He violated that policy to CREATE a threat.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> So you do admit it exists.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Admit what: that a policy exists which he violated?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving   
   vehicles.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle   
   unless:   
   >>>>>>>>>> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another   
   person   
   >>>>>>>>>> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the   
   vehicle is   
   >>>>>>>>>> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious   
   physical   
   >>>>>>>>>> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   >>>>>>>>>> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the   
   path   
   >>>>>>>>>> of the vehicle.'   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Read that last part until you get it:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to   
   exist,   
   >>>>>>>>>> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Admit we don't do court here like you do in commie   
   >>>>>>>>> KKKanada. The jury will also look at the things that   
   >>>>>>>>> happened and the reaction and realize that he was self   
   >>>>>>>>> defending. Happens a lot.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Not when the see he could simply have stepped out of the way.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Nope. Reread what I wrote.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Sure.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Done.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> He could still have just kept walking and never been in a position to be   
   >>>>>> struck  at all.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And she could have just kept driving and she would be   
   >>>>> alive today.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> She attempted to just drive away...   
   >>>   
   >>> By making a 3 point turn?   
   >>   
   >> At first, yes.   
   >>   
   > First of what?   
      
   Her first attempt to drive away was back the way she had come.   
      
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...and Jonathan Ross decided to stop walking while he was still   
   >>>> potentially in her path and was drawing his weapon before the car even   
   >>>> started moving forward.   
   >>>   
   >>> She was impeding them.   
   >> You don't get to draw your weapon on someone for "impeding" even if she   
   >> was...   
   >   
   > Yes you do if you feel threatened.   
      
   What was threatening about a car backing up?   
      
   >>   
   >> ...which is funny because she was waving ICE vehicles past her.   
   >   
   > Nope. You said she didn't know who they were.   
   I never said that. Not once.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)