Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,527 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: Poor Little Rich Kid... So Desperate    |
|    19 Jan 26 17:07:31    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kmcou$nduj$17@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-19 14:44, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10kma28$nduj$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com       > > says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-18 16:44, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kjs1l$3rq66$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:55, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>> In article <10kf352$28hf2$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:14, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>> In article <10keu4p$27aph$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:53, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kemhj$24cdg$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:38, Socialism is for losers wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.       > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken       from       > >>>>>>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary       manner.       > >>>>>>>>>>> No, it jerked ahead.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> There is a video that shows it did not.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> And there are more that show it did.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> So produce a link to one.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Run away!       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away       from him...       > >>>>>>>>>>> ...and yet she hit him.       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing       her car".       > >>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him. She just       didn't       > >>>>>>>>>>> expect that he'd be ready with a gun.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> On the contrary.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> He was clearly moving as she began to back and turn her wheel       left.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> On a one way street.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> Then he CHOOSES to stop in front of the left corner of her car       and draw       > >>>>>>>>>> his weapon when one more step to his right would have put him out       of any       > >>>>>>>>>> danger being struck.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> Her intent to simply leave can be inferred from the fact that she       was       > >>>>>>>>>> turning away from him. His own cellphone video shows it.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> Why was she there?       > >>>>>>>> She was returning home after dropping her child at school.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> But you said she wasn't familiar with the street. You shot       > >>>>> yourself in the foot again.       > >>>>       > >>>> I never said that. I said that in a high stress situation, she tried to       > >>>> turn around to drive back in the direction she'd come before realizing       > >>>> that she was on a one way street.       > >>>       > >>> She should have already known it was a one way street. Why       > >>> didn't she just keep driving?       > >>       > >> Because it was a high stress situation and she at first thought turning       > >> around was the better choice.       > >       > >       > > How do you know that is what she was thinking? She caused       > > the situation which brings me to court. They will say he       > > was in a high stress situation and the policies argument       > > will go out the window.       > >       >       > Nope. Because that is why policies and training exist in the first place.              Yes, you have no idea how we do it here. That's why we       have lawyers and he will be getting a good one. He's rich       ya know.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca