Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,530 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: Poor Little Rich Kid... So Desperate    |
|    19 Jan 26 16:15:44    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-19 16:07, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kmcou$nduj$17@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-19 14:44, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10kma28$nduj$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com       >>> says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-18 16:44, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kjs1l$3rq66$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:55, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10kf352$28hf2$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:14, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10keu4p$27aph$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:53, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kemhj$24cdg$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:38, Socialism is for losers wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken       from       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary       manner.       >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it jerked ahead.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> There is a video that shows it did not.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> And there are more that show it did.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> So produce a link to one.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Run away!       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away       from him...       >>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and yet she hit him.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing       her car".       >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him. She just       didn't       >>>>>>>>>>>>> expect that he'd be ready with a gun.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> On the contrary.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> He was clearly moving as she began to back and turn her wheel       left.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> Then he CHOOSES to stop in front of the left corner of her car       and draw       >>>>>>>>>>>> his weapon when one more step to his right would have put him out       of any       >>>>>>>>>>>> danger being struck.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> Her intent to simply leave can be inferred from the fact that she       was       >>>>>>>>>>>> turning away from him. His own cellphone video shows it.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Why was she there?       >>>>>>>>>> She was returning home after dropping her child at school.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> But you said she wasn't familiar with the street. You shot       >>>>>>> yourself in the foot again.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I never said that. I said that in a high stress situation, she tried to       >>>>>> turn around to drive back in the direction she'd come before realizing       >>>>>> that she was on a one way street.       >>>>>       >>>>> She should have already known it was a one way street. Why       >>>>> didn't she just keep driving?       >>>>       >>>> Because it was a high stress situation and she at first thought turning       >>>> around was the better choice.       >>>       >>>       >>> How do you know that is what she was thinking? She caused       >>> the situation which brings me to court. They will say he       >>> was in a high stress situation and the policies argument       >>> will go out the window.       >>>       >>       >> Nope. Because that is why policies and training exist in the first place.       >       > Yes, you have no idea how we do it here. That's why we       > have lawyers and he will be getting a good one. He's rich       > ya know.              Is he? And how did that happen?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca