Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,531 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again    |
|    19 Jan 26 16:08:27    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-19 15:51, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kmdb9$nduj$21@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-17 15:59, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10kh3km$2tnfv$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:44, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kf2i4$28hf2$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:42, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10kes61$26qks$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:12, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10keimd$23gth$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700, Skeeter says...       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.       >>>>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her       right.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> and him getting hit.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Nope. That doesn't actuall appear in his video...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> ...but than you for admitting it does show she was turning hard right.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Yet still went forward.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> If you mean straight forward, it most certainly did not.       >>>>>       >>>>> But it did until she flopped out.       >>>>       >>>> After the shooting? How is that relevant?       >>>       >>> She fell against the wheel.       >>       >> So the steering wheel wasn't turned to the right...       >>       >> ...as you can clearly see in the Jonathan Ross's cellphone video?       >       > I can't tell which way it is turned.              Bullshit. She has clearly spun it close to if not all the way to the right.              And video from the exterior of the car shows the same.              >>       >>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>> I never admitted anything cupcake.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> That is the implication of your use of "and" in the sentence fragment       >>>>>> you were attaching to my earlier sentence.       >>>>>       >>>>> I didn't admit anything liar.       >>>> You should learn how English works before you type anything more.       >>>       >>> You should get some real facts before you speak anymore.       >> When someone makes a statement, and someone replies with a sentence       >> fragment beginning with "and", it is implicit that they accept the       >> original statement as true.       >       > Says who?       Grice, H. P. (1975). "Logic and Conversation." In Syntax and Semantics,       Vol. 3, Speech Acts              Garner, Bryan A. (2016). Garner's Modern English Usage. Oxford       University Press. (See the entry for "Conjunctions" and "And.")              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca