XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kmgfl$n7db$20@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 15:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kmcpj$nduj$18@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-19 14:48, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kmbtj$n7db$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > >>> says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-19 14:35, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10km9i9$nduj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > >>>>> says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-19 04:25, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:16:03 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 04:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:47:25 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the   
   area.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   > >>>>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her   
   right...   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> ...and running RIGHT into him, hard.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Nope. It shows the phone suddenly moving, but that proves nothing.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> There are other videos that showed what happened.  Why are there only   
   > >>>>>>> two idiots here who can't admit she hit the agent?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Why can't you show a single example where the actual contact is shown?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Why are you inclined to defend a domestic terrorist?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Bootstrapping.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> You can only call her a "terrorist" by claiming she acted with malicious   
   > >>>> intent, and then you can claim she had malicious intent because she was   
   > >>>> a "terrorist"   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Her wife showed malicious intent. We been through this   
   > >>> already.   
   > >> Videoing is "malicious intent" now?   
   > >   
   > > Taunting and daring ICE to do something. You continently   
   > > left that part out.   
   >   
   > Even if it were true (and you haven't shown that it is), taunting and   
   > daring are still not malicious.   
      
   It shows intent.   
   >   
   > They are protected free speech.   
      
   So were the church members at the church the "protesters"   
   attacked. So were the two guys They beat the hell out of.   
   So was Charlie Kirk.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)