XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kono8$1h5nl$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 16:42, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >   
   > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:46:34 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >   
   > >>> She got out EXACTLY to do what Skeeter said.   
   > >>   
   > >> Even if that's true, it doesn't justify shooting Renee Good.   
   > >   
   > > So... if Good had a gun, would it be justified?   
   >   
   > Merely had it? Or pointed it at the officer?   
   >   
   > >   
   > > Why?   
   >   
   > Why is it different?   
   >   
   > Because there is no, "objectively reasonable means of defense" you can   
   > use when faced with a gun.   
   >   
   > You can't "mov[e] out of the path" of a bullet, as you can with a   
   > "vehicle".   
      
   That guy on The Matrix could.   
   >   
   > >   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Her and fella lesbo were there to do what the organization they're a   
   part of   
   > >>> WANTED them to do.   
   > >>   
   > >> What organization would that be?   
   > >   
   > > Look it up, lazy faggot.   
   >   
   > So you've got nothing again.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)