XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-20 15:17, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kooe0$1gqer$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-19 18:51, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kml3b$r6ke$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   >>> says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-19 16:09, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kmd75$n7db$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-19 14:55, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kmbp2$n7db$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   >>>>>>> says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-19 14:22, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:09:12 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 16:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kjs1l$3rq66$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:55, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf352$28hf2$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keu4p$27aph$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:53, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kemhj$24cdg$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:38, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video   
   taken from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary   
   manner.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it jerked ahead.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a video that shows it did not.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And there are more that show it did.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So produce a link to one.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Run away!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering   
   away from him...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and yet she hit him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was   
   "weaponizing her car".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him. She   
   just didn't   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect that he'd be ready with a gun.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the contrary.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He was clearly moving as she began to back and turn her   
   wheel left.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then he CHOOSES to stop in front of the left corner of her   
   car and draw   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his weapon when one more step to his right would have put   
   him out of any   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danger being struck.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Her intent to simply leave can be inferred from the fact   
   that she was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turning away from him. His own cellphone video shows it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why was she there?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was returning home after dropping her child at school.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> But you said she wasn't familiar with the street. You shot   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself in the foot again.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I never said that. I said that in a high stress situation, she   
   tried to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> turn around to drive back in the direction she'd come before   
   realizing   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that she was on a one way street.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> She should have already known it was a one way street. Why   
   >>>>>>>>>>> didn't she just keep driving?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Because it was a high stress situation and she at first thought   
   turning   
   >>>>>>>>>> around was the better choice.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>  Leftists claim that they can read dead people's minds.   
   >>>>>>>> I don't claim to read anyone's mind.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I offered a very reasonable scenario for why someone might forget   
   that a   
   >>>>>>>> street was one way only.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> No you didn't. As a driver it's your place to know.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes. And yet accidents still happen.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Driving the wrong way on a one way street is not an   
   >>>>> accident.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's a mistake: to in a moment of stress forget that it was a one way   
   >>>> street.   
   >>>   
   >>> She was already driving down it you moro.   
   >>   
   >> So?   
   >   
   > So she should have known.   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Why didn't she just keep driving?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The street ahead was blocked by ICE vehicles at that time?   
   >>>   
   >>> How do you know?   
   >>   
   >> How do you know it wasn't?   
   >   
   > Even if it was she still drove down there. Why I wonder.   
      
   You think that because you turn onto a street you can tell what's   
   happening farther down?   
      
   Interesting.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)