XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-20 15:10, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10koniv$1h5nl$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-19 16:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kmhb2$n7db$24@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-19 15:56, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kmdta$n7db$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 16:56, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kjsfd$3rq66$25@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kjq10$3rq8m$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:36, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kh200$2tnfv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 00:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 17:06:56 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:43, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:35:41 -0800, Alan    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:53, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:43:39 -0800, Alan    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:17:39 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was in the Queen's York Rangers.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhhh... NO ONE gives a shit.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Had a lot of people trying to run you over in cars, did   
   you?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. But she wasn't trying to run him over.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She wouldn't have turned the wheel all the way to the right   
   if she was.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think you could read her mind?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only available facts are that she hit him and he killed   
   her.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can read the fact that a man was walking to her left and   
   she was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steering to the right. Those are facts too.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He was not walking when she hit him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my point: he stopped.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When all the use of force policies explicitly state you   
   shouldn't stop   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in front of a vehicle...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...he stopped.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> and she hit him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> That remains unproven.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> But stopping was specifically called out in the use of force   
   policies as   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> something he SHOULD NOT DO, and also that using deadly force   
   against a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle is only permissible when the agent cannot avoid being   
   hit...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ...which he could have by taking one more step.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Customs and Border Patrol were called out in a 2013 report   
   specifically   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> for stopping in front of vehicles and then using that as a   
   justification   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> for shooting people.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> One more step to his right / her left and he is completely   
   clear of any   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible conflict.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Had she obeyed the commands she would still be alive.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> There was no command to stop.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> There was and she was there for a reason. That reason got   
   >>>>>>>>>>> her killed.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> So you're admitting the shot at her for the reason YOU imagine?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> What?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You said "she was there for a reason". Ergo, you imagine you know what   
   >>>>>>>> that reason is. Do you have a belief about that?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She was there to incite. Proof of that is her wife acting   
   >>>>>>> like a banshee.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The wife wasn't even raising her voice.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Oh but she was.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bi2nUdZzE34   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Sorry, but that link has not one second of video from the incident, but   
   >>>> rather a MAGA zealots take on it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SafgHV2wLM   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That one doesn't show anyone yelling either.   
   >>>   
   >>> Denial.   
   >>   
   >> It doesn't show anyone yelling. Period.   
   >   
   > It does. You lose.   
      
   Give a time when that happens.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)