XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-19 16:35, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kmh1r$n7db$23@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-19 15:51, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kmdb9$nduj$21@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-17 15:59, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kh3km$2tnfv$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kf2i4$28hf2$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kes61$26qks$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keimd$23gth$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the   
   area.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her   
   right.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> and him getting hit.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Nope. That doesn't actuall appear in his video...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> ...but than you for admitting it does show she was turning hard   
   right.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Yet still went forward.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you mean straight forward, it most certainly did not.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> But it did until she flopped out.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> After the shooting? How is that relevant?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She fell against the wheel.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So the steering wheel wasn't turned to the right...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...as you can clearly see in the Jonathan Ross's cellphone video?   
   >>>   
   >>> I can't tell which way it is turned.   
   >>   
   >> Bullshit. She has clearly spun it close to if not all the way to the right.   
   >   
   > I don't have super vision like you I guess.   
      
   You've clearly avoided watching the videos.   
      
   >>   
   >> And video from the exterior of the car shows the same.   
   >   
   > She hit him.   
      
   That remains unproven.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I never admitted anything cupcake.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That is the implication of your use of "and" in the sentence fragment   
   >>>>>>>> you were attaching to my earlier sentence.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I didn't admit anything liar.   
   >>>>>> You should learn how English works before you type anything more.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You should get some real facts before you speak anymore.   
   >>>> When someone makes a statement, and someone replies with a sentence   
   >>>> fragment beginning with "and", it is implicit that they accept the   
   >>>> original statement as true.   
   >>>   
   >>> Says who?   
   >> Grice, H. P. (1975). "Logic and Conversation." In Syntax and Semantics,   
   >> Vol. 3, Speech Acts   
   >>   
   >> Garner, Bryan A. (2016). Garner's Modern English Usage. Oxford   
   >> University Press. (See the entry for "Conjunctions" and "And.")   
   >   
   > So? This is usenet not a college class.   
   English usage is still English usage.   
      
   "So?" in your reply indicates your acceptance of the two preceding cites   
   as factual.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)