Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,610 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: Here We Go Again...Desperation Is, A    |
|    21 Jan 26 06:43:00    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kpe2u$1nett$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-19 16:34, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10kmgkj$n7db$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > > uh@nope.com says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-19 15:49, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kmd4m$n7db$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com       > >>> says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-19 14:54, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>> In article <10kmc75$nduj$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> On 2026-01-19 14:38, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>> In article <10kma0i$nduj$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com       > >>>>>>> says...       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 16:41, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kjrqc$3rq66$17@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kjpuf$3rq66$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kh336$2tn8q$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:29, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His: tell us of his training. Tell us what HIS       training was when he was about       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be run over by a domestic insurrectionist       terrorist, who was blocking him       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his fellow federal agents, from performing       his/their duties as ICE agents.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought you'd never ask!       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Chapter 1: General Guidelines       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WHOSE "guidelines?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Customs and Border Patrol's "Use of Force Policy".       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All go out the window when someone is trying to run you       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. That is exactly when the policy comes into play.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck the policy? You are just looking for an excuse to       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hate.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The policy exists to protect both law enforcement and       citizens.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He violated that policy to CREATE a threat.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you do admit it exists.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> Admit what: that a policy exists which he violated?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving       vehicles.       > >>>>>>>>>>>> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving       vehicle unless:       > >>>>>>>>>>>> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or       another person       > >>>>>>>>>>>> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the       vehicle is       > >>>>>>>>>>>> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious       physical       > >>>>>>>>>>>> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively       reasonable       > >>>>>>>>>>>> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of       the path       > >>>>>>>>>>>> of the vehicle.'       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> Read that last part until you get it:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to       exist,       > >>>>>>>>>>>> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> Admit we don't do court here like you do in commie       > >>>>>>>>>>> KKKanada. The jury will also look at the things that       > >>>>>>>>>>> happened and the reaction and realize that he was self       > >>>>>>>>>>> defending. Happens a lot.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> Not when the see he could simply have stepped out of the way.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> Nope. Reread what I wrote.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Sure.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Done.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> He could still have just kept walking and never been in a position       to be       > >>>>>>>> struck at all.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> And she could have just kept driving and she would be       > >>>>>>> alive today.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> She attempted to just drive away...       > >>>>>       > >>>>> By making a 3 point turn?       > >>>>       > >>>> At first, yes.       > >>>>       > >>> First of what?       > >>       > >> Her first attempt to drive away was back the way she had come.       > >       > > By turning on a one way street?       >       > Yup.       >       > If a street were completely blocked by the presence of a fire engine,       > wouldn't YOU turn around and go back the way you'd come?              I wouldn't drive right up to it and have my partner jump       out and taunt them.       >       > >>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> ...and Jonathan Ross decided to stop walking while he was still       > >>>>>> potentially in her path and was drawing his weapon before the car even       > >>>>>> started moving forward.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> She was impeding them.       > >>>> You don't get to draw your weapon on someone for "impeding" even if she       > >>>> was...       > >>>       > >>> Yes you do if you feel threatened.       > >>       > >> What was threatening about a car backing up?       > > She went forward and hit him.       >       > So his conclusion from watching a car back up was that her intention was       > to hit him?       >              It was a second. She FAFO and you just want to argue.       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>> ...which is funny because she was waving ICE vehicles past her.       > >>>       > >>> Nope. You said she didn't know who they were.       > >> I never said that. Not once.       > >       > > Way back you said maybe she didn't realize it was a one       > > way street. Why not?       > Stress of the moment.              I reckon a suv coming at me would be stressful also.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca