home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,614 of 997,123   
   Skeeter to All   
   Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again   
   21 Jan 26 06:56:12   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kpdpj$1nett$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 16:35, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kmh1r$n7db$23@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-19 15:51, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kmdb9$nduj$21@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-17 15:59, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kh3km$2tnfv$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10kf2i4$28hf2$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kes61$26qks$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keimd$23gth$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the   
   area.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to   
   her right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> and him getting hit.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Nope. That doesn't actuall appear in his video...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> ...but than you for admitting it does show she was turning hard   
   right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Yet still went forward.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> If you mean straight forward, it most certainly did not.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> But it did until she flopped out.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> After the shooting? How is that relevant?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> She fell against the wheel.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> So the steering wheel wasn't turned to the right...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...as you can clearly see in the Jonathan Ross's cellphone video?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I can't tell which way it is turned.   
   > >>   
   > >> Bullshit. She has clearly spun it close to if not all the way to the   
   right.   
   > >   
   > > I don't have super vision like you I guess.   
   >   
   > You've clearly avoided watching the videos.   
      
   I watch them all the time.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> And video from the exterior of the car shows the same.   
   > >   
   > > She hit him.   
   >   
   > That remains unproven.   
      
   He will not be charged.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> I never admitted anything cupcake.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> That is the implication of your use of "and" in the sentence   
   fragment   
   > >>>>>>>> you were attaching to my earlier sentence.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> I didn't admit anything liar.   
   > >>>>>> You should learn how English works before you type anything more.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> You should get some real facts before you speak anymore.   
   > >>>> When someone makes a statement, and someone replies with a sentence   
   > >>>> fragment beginning with "and", it is implicit that they accept the   
   > >>>> original statement as true.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Says who?   
   > >> Grice, H. P. (1975). "Logic and Conversation." In Syntax and Semantics,   
   > >> Vol. 3, Speech Acts   
   > >>   
   > >> Garner, Bryan A. (2016). Garner's Modern English Usage. Oxford   
   > >> University Press. (See the entry for "Conjunctions" and "And.")   
   > >   
   > > So? This is usenet not a college class.   
   > English usage is still English usage.   
      
   Only in your little bubble where you need policies and   
   news to tell you how to thing.   
   >   
   > "So?" in your reply indicates your acceptance of the two preceding cites   
   > as factual.   
      
   There you go again reading minds.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca