Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,614 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: Liberal Faggot... Wrong Again    |
|    21 Jan 26 06:56:12    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kpdpj$1nett$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-19 16:35, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10kmh1r$n7db$23@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > > uh@nope.com says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-19 15:51, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kmdb9$nduj$21@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-17 15:59, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>> In article <10kh3km$2tnfv$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:44, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>> In article <10kf2i4$28hf2$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:42, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kes61$26qks$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:12, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keimd$23gth$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700, Skeeter says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the       area.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.       > >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to       her right.       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> and him getting hit.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> Nope. That doesn't actuall appear in his video...       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> ...but than you for admitting it does show she was turning hard       right.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> Yet still went forward.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> If you mean straight forward, it most certainly did not.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> But it did until she flopped out.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> After the shooting? How is that relevant?       > >>>>>       > >>>>> She fell against the wheel.       > >>>>       > >>>> So the steering wheel wasn't turned to the right...       > >>>>       > >>>> ...as you can clearly see in the Jonathan Ross's cellphone video?       > >>>       > >>> I can't tell which way it is turned.       > >>       > >> Bullshit. She has clearly spun it close to if not all the way to the       right.       > >       > > I don't have super vision like you I guess.       >       > You've clearly avoided watching the videos.              I watch them all the time.       >       > >>       > >> And video from the exterior of the car shows the same.       > >       > > She hit him.       >       > That remains unproven.              He will not be charged.       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> I never admitted anything cupcake.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> That is the implication of your use of "and" in the sentence       fragment       > >>>>>>>> you were attaching to my earlier sentence.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> I didn't admit anything liar.       > >>>>>> You should learn how English works before you type anything more.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> You should get some real facts before you speak anymore.       > >>>> When someone makes a statement, and someone replies with a sentence       > >>>> fragment beginning with "and", it is implicit that they accept the       > >>>> original statement as true.       > >>>       > >>> Says who?       > >> Grice, H. P. (1975). "Logic and Conversation." In Syntax and Semantics,       > >> Vol. 3, Speech Acts       > >>       > >> Garner, Bryan A. (2016). Garner's Modern English Usage. Oxford       > >> University Press. (See the entry for "Conjunctions" and "And.")       > >       > > So? This is usenet not a college class.       > English usage is still English usage.              Only in your little bubble where you need policies and       news to tell you how to thing.       >       > "So?" in your reply indicates your acceptance of the two preceding cites       > as factual.              There you go again reading minds.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca