XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kpbkq$1nett$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-20 17:24, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kp65h$1mfma$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-20 15:17, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kooe0$1gqer$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-19 18:51, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kml3b$r6ke$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > >>>>> says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-19 16:09, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10kmd75$n7db$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-19 14:55, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kmbp2$n7db$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > >>>>>>>>> says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-19 14:22, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:09:12 -0800, Alan wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 16:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kjs1l$3rq66$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:55, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf352$28hf2$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keu4p$27aph$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:53, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kemhj$24cdg$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:38, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is   
   video taken from   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely   
   ordinary manner.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it jerked ahead.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a video that shows it did not.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And there are more that show it did.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So produce a link to one.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Run away!   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly   
   steering away from him...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and yet she hit him.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was   
   "weaponizing her car".   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him.   
   She just didn't   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect that he'd be ready with a gun.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the contrary.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He was clearly moving as she began to back and turn her   
   wheel left.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then he CHOOSES to stop in front of the left corner of   
   her car and draw   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his weapon when one more step to his right would have   
   put him out of any   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danger being struck.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Her intent to simply leave can be inferred from the   
   fact that she was   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turning away from him. His own cellphone video shows it.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why was she there?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was returning home after dropping her child at school.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you said she wasn't familiar with the street. You shot   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself in the foot again.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never said that. I said that in a high stress situation,   
   she tried to   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn around to drive back in the direction she'd come before   
   realizing   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that she was on a one way street.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> She should have already known it was a one way street. Why   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't she just keep driving?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Because it was a high stress situation and she at first thought   
   turning   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> around was the better choice.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Leftists claim that they can read dead people's minds.   
   > >>>>>>>>>> I don't claim to read anyone's mind.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> I offered a very reasonable scenario for why someone might forget   
   that a   
   > >>>>>>>>>> street was one way only.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> No you didn't. As a driver it's your place to know.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Yes. And yet accidents still happen.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Driving the wrong way on a one way street is not an   
   > >>>>>>> accident.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> It's a mistake: to in a moment of stress forget that it was a one way   
   > >>>>>> street.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> She was already driving down it you moro.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> So?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> So she should have known.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Why didn't she just keep driving?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> The street ahead was blocked by ICE vehicles at that time?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> How do you know?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> How do you know it wasn't?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Even if it was she still drove down there. Why I wonder.   
   > >>   
   > >> You think that because you turn onto a street you can tell what's   
   > >> happening farther down?   
   > >>   
   > >> Interesting.   
   > >   
   > > Most people who can see enough to drive can.   
   >   
   > No, actually.   
   >   
   > First: ICE vehicles don't look like anything special...   
   >   
   > ...until they turn on their flashing lights.   
   >   
   > Second: vehicles in front of you can prevent you from seeing vehicles   
   > ahead of them.   
   >   
   > A realize a shut-in wouldn't understand these things.   
      
   Nice try but you are stretching it. Face it. She knew what   
   she was doing. She knew who they were. This is settled.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|