XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-21 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   > On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 12:08:06 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2026-01-15 16:04, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kbt2b$15km6$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-14 22:05, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10k9gk6$dphk$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   >>>>> says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:45:54 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> We'll wait.  This should be seriously amusing.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The agent can be anywhere that he can see the windshield.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And the bullet hole would show the path of a bullet coming in from a   
   side   
   >>>>>>> angle. That bullet hole clearly shows it was fired from in front of the   
   >>>>>>> vehicle and NOT from the side.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You know nothing about ballistics.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Are you claim that a person standing outside the line of the car's   
   sides   
   >>>>>>>> can't SEE the windshield?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You are one fucking idiot.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> How did the bullet go through the windshield from the side and hit the   
   driver?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Who says that that's the bullet that struck her?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No matter. One of them did.  LOL   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Indeed.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But what matters in terms of the use of deadly force is why he kept   
   >>>> firing after there was no more threat to him.   
   >>>   
   >>> How do you know what he was thinking? You just want to   
   >>> hate.   
   >>   
   >> I don't have to know what he was thinking.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Yet you judge him as if you no.   
      
   Nope. I judge his ACTIONS.   
      
   >   
   >> He fired two more shots at a vehicle that was no longer a threat to him   
   >> or to anyone else.   
   >   
   > Officers are trained to keep shooting until the threat is eliminated.   
   > You judge him by something that happened in fewer than a few seconds.   
      
   The "threat" was eliminated the moment he was beside the moving car.   
      
   The "threat" wouldn't have existed in the first place if he'd followed   
   doctrine and not stopped in front of the car in the first place.   
      
   You know that there was a report on CBP officers CREATING a threat by   
   doing just that, right?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)