home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,640 of 997,123   
   AlleyCat to All   
   What Faggots Do, When They've Already Lo   
   21 Jan 26 18:14:02   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: katt@gmail.com   
      
   On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:24:11 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
      
   > > "Go to youtube" and randomly search, when implicit in your claim is that   
   > > you know where such a video is?   
   >   
   > I didn't say randomly search. I said click on live.   
      
   This is what faggots do, when they've already lost the argument.   
      
   Congrats. You've got him spewing bullshit that has NO bearing on the case. He   
   only wants to argue the minutiae.   
      
   It's his last resort... fill up Usenet with useless minutiae and pretend he's   
   won... to himself, of course.   
      
   I don't know what aspect of this case you two are dealing with here, since I   
   deleted most of the 100s of replies in this thread. I got really sick of the   
   bullshit faggot boy spewed, so bear with me.   
      
   Oh... I HAVE the whole thread(s), but fuck that... I don't feel like wasting   
   too much time on this lying bastard. Again, this might be totally off base,   
   but...   
      
   You are dealing with a classic case of "selective evidence" from this asshole.   
   He's anchoring his entire argument on one specific camera angle while ignoring   
   the broader context that the officers actually had to deal with in real-time.   
      
   The legal standard for use of force (based on Graham v. Connor) doesn't   
   require an officer to be 100% certain a bystander will be hit; it requires   
   that a reasonable officer on the scene would perceive an immediate threat.   
      
   I'll leave it at that.   
      
   He wants to pick out bullshit minutiae that hasn't a fucking thing to do with   
   the fact that Good ran into him.   
      
   NO ONE cares why. She did it and that's all that counts. If she hadn't died,   
   she'd probably be going to prison.   
      
   =============================================================================   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition   
      
   All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.   
      
   "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has   
   been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the   
   point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."   
      
   Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the   
   Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or   
   stages:   
      
   "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The   
   president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were   
   all it took to change the world."   
      
   "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's   
   vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of   
   hyperbole."   
      
   "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from   
   reality."   
      
   The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk   
   opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump   
   announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would   
   suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.   
   There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be   
   received positively by TDSers.   
      
   The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early   
   2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-   
   night comics and nothing more.   
      
   Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first   
   coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.   
   The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in   
   otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -   
   the very existence of George W. Bush."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca