XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10krls1$2h0ng$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-21 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 12:08:06 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2026-01-15 16:04, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kbt2b$15km6$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-14 22:05, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10k9gk6$dphk$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > >>>>> says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:45:54 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> We'll wait.  This should be seriously amusing.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> The agent can be anywhere that he can see the windshield.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> And the bullet hole would show the path of a bullet coming in from a   
   side   
   > >>>>>>> angle. That bullet hole clearly shows it was fired from in front of   
   the   
   > >>>>>>> vehicle and NOT from the side.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> You know nothing about ballistics.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Are you claim that a person standing outside the line of the car's   
   sides   
   > >>>>>>>> can't SEE the windshield?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> You are one fucking idiot.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> How did the bullet go through the windshield from the side and hit   
   the driver?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Who says that that's the bullet that struck her?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> No matter. One of them did.  LOL   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Indeed.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> But what matters in terms of the use of deadly force is why he kept   
   > >>>> firing after there was no more threat to him.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> How do you know what he was thinking? You just want to   
   > >>> hate.   
   > >>   
   > >> I don't have to know what he was thinking.   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > > Yet you judge him as if you no.   
   >   
   > Nope. I judge his ACTIONS.   
      
   You also have to know what they are thinking to get a   
   motive.   
   >   
   > >   
   > >> He fired two more shots at a vehicle that was no longer a threat to him   
   > >> or to anyone else.   
   > >   
   > > Officers are trained to keep shooting until the threat is eliminated.   
   > > You judge him by something that happened in fewer than a few seconds.   
   >   
   > The "threat" was eliminated the moment he was beside the moving car.   
      
   No matter. It's over and he won.   
   >   
   > The "threat" wouldn't have existed in the first place if he'd followed   
   > doctrine and not stopped in front of the car in the first place.   
      
   "DOCTRINE"   She could have followed orders and just got   
   out.   
   >   
   > You know that there was a report on CBP officers CREATING a threat by   
   > doing just that, right?   
      
   Nope. She tried to run him over. That is settled.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)