XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kroc0$2hqko$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-21 05:56, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kpdpj$1nett$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-19 16:35, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kmh1r$n7db$23@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-19 15:51, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kmdb9$nduj$21@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:59, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10kh3km$2tnfv$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2i4$28hf2$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes61$26qks$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keimd$23gth$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the   
   area.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to   
   her right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and him getting hit.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. That doesn't actuall appear in his video...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> ...but than you for admitting it does show she was turning hard   
   right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Yet still went forward.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> If you mean straight forward, it most certainly did not.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> But it did until she flopped out.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> After the shooting? How is that relevant?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> She fell against the wheel.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> So the steering wheel wasn't turned to the right...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> ...as you can clearly see in the Jonathan Ross's cellphone video?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> I can't tell which way it is turned.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Bullshit. She has clearly spun it close to if not all the way to the   
   right.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I don't have super vision like you I guess.   
   > >>   
   > >> You've clearly avoided watching the videos.   
   > >   
   > > I watch them all the time.   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> And video from the exterior of the car shows the same.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> She hit him.   
   > >>   
   > >> That remains unproven.   
   > >   
   > > He will not be charged.   
   >   
   > Certainly not by the federal authorities...   
   >   
   > ...who have said they're not even going to investigate.   
      
   No need. They know what happened. The local law   
   enforcement is biased and need to sit this one out.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> I never admitted anything cupcake.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> That is the implication of your use of "and" in the sentence   
   fragment   
   > >>>>>>>>>> you were attaching to my earlier sentence.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> I didn't admit anything liar.   
   > >>>>>>>> You should learn how English works before you type anything more.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> You should get some real facts before you speak anymore.   
   > >>>>>> When someone makes a statement, and someone replies with a sentence   
   > >>>>>> fragment beginning with "and", it is implicit that they accept the   
   > >>>>>> original statement as true.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Says who?   
   > >>>> Grice, H. P. (1975). "Logic and Conversation." In Syntax and Semantics,   
   > >>>> Vol. 3, Speech Acts   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Garner, Bryan A. (2016). Garner's Modern English Usage. Oxford   
   > >>>> University Press. (See the entry for "Conjunctions" and "And.")   
   > >>>   
   > >>> So? This is usenet not a college class.   
   > >> English usage is still English usage.   
   > >   
   > > Only in your little bubble where you need policies and   
   > > news to tell you how to thing.   
   > >>   
   > >> "So?" in your reply indicates your acceptance of the two preceding cites   
   > >> as factual.   
   > >   
   > > There you go again reading minds.   
   > There I go again...   
   >   
   > ...understanding English usage.   
      
   You assume and twist words around. You have no   
   creditability. Why is it all the kooks I meet from Canada   
   are  the same?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)