Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 997,101 of 997,123    |
|    AlleyCat to All    |
|    The Commies In Canadian Government Are P    |
|    14 Feb 26 19:52:46    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc       From: katt@gmail.com              Canada Minister Marc Miller is questioned about their new bill under the       Liberal government led by Prime Minister Mark Carney that would EXEMPT ALL       MINISTERS FROM ALL LAWS.              This faggot must be Ski Bunny's brother. Watch the way he plays bullshit       liberal semantics when trying to explain this.              But why should one minister, individual minister, be allowed to bypass 150       years of Canadian law and exempt a person or company of their choosing?              Look, that may be your view, but I don't think that is what's happening here.              Well, that's how it's written.              It doesn't SAY PEOPLE ARE BEING EXEMPTED FROM 150 YEARS OF LAW.              (pure liberal semantics bullshit - Ski Bunny MUST be proud)              It says from any federal law except the criminal code.              Right. There's no mention of years. (liberal semantics bullshit)              It's any federal law. So it's any federal law that has been passed over the       last 150 years.              Right. I'm not going to parse this out with you. (YOU already "parsed this       out", faggot)              So just to be clear, you don't need it to do your job, but you want to keep it       nonetheless.              I think it's helpful to have.              Do you see the potential of abuse, though, in that companies or people will       have to lobby you personally, and not care about the law itself?              No one's asked me to overturn any laws.              You would have the ability to.              In some context, perhaps, but again, this is something that would have to be       used very judiciously.              How could you possibly think that this would not undermine the trust in our       Democracy, then?              I think (you THINK) Canadians expect us to act reasonably, I think Canadians       expect us to be judicious in our decision-making. Passing a law like C-15,       which all members will have the opportunity to vote on, is something that is       inherently accountable in and of itself.              Well, it has this particular clause that is very problematic. It is all over       the news. I have a letter with 43 organizations asking for you to strike it       because of the potential of abuse, but you still want to keep it.              I think I've answered that question about three times now. (run, faggot...       RUNNNNN!)              I just don't find it reasonable for you to have the powers of a king,       essentially.              I certainly don't have the powers of a king.              If you are allowed to exempt any entity from any federal law, it is like the       powers of a king.              Is that a statement or a question?              Well, it's a fact.              https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2021515265239117824/vid/avc1/720x1280/vG       JYn8a2DXUn6J8I.mp4              Yes, you heard that correctly.              Hidden in the omnibus budget implementation bill, section 208 or clause 12       amends the Red Tape Reduction Act to grant federal cabinet ministers broad       discretionary powers              Ministers would be able to temporarily exempt any individual, company,       organization, or entity from the application of almost any provision of any       federal law (or regulations made under those laws) that the minister is       responsible for administering or enforcing, with the sole exception of the       Criminal Code.              They can themselves, and deem anyone they choose exempt from ALL laws. The       only exception is the criminal code.              He says you can trust them because "Canadians expect us to act reasonably".              Then, WHY have it in the bill?                     =====              Canada:              'Worst In The World': Here Are All The Rankings In Which Canada Is Now Last              Most Unaffordable Housing, Highest Cell phone Bills And Worst Rate of Acute       Care Beds, To Name A Few              If you spend any time on social media, it's likely that you've seen this       graphic compiled by columnist Stephen Lautens that assembles 11 international       indices which feature Canada near the top spot. "Canada is broken? I don't       think so. Neither does the world," reads a caption.              Next time someone rants on how about how "broken" Canada is; or how badly we       are doing on the international stage share some facts.              Numbers don't lie, Felicia.              https://archive.is/o/LnFRL/https://twitter.com/DIGuideBradley/status/155454507       9314010112              Naturally, it only tells a partial picture. While Canada may dominate abstract       indices such as "quality of life" and "peace," there are plenty of far more       empirical indicators in which we measurably rank as among the worst in the       developed world.              There's plenty to like about Canada, but below is a not-at-all comprehensive       list of all the ways in which we are indeed very broken.              WE HAVE THE MOST UNAFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE OECD              The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is essentially a       club of the world's 38 most developed countries. And when these 38 are ranked       against each other for housing unaffordability, Canada emerges as the clear       champion. OECD analysts rank affordability by comparing average home prices to       average incomes, and according to their latest quarterly rankings Canada was       No. 1 for salaries that were most out of whack with the cost of a home.              Housing by price to income ratio for the second quarter of 2022. That's Canada       on the extreme right.              https://archive.is/LnFRL/840da40d6fa3b7fef6fcccdfc1637d24e0786760.webp              WE HAVE THE WORLD'S MOST EXPENSIVE WIRELESS COSTS              Every year, the Finnish telecom analyst Rewheel ranks the world's most       expensive countries for wireless services. And last year, Canada once again       dominated. Across several metrics, Canada was found to be the most expensive       place in the world for mobile data. Analysts found that it would cost the       average Canadian the equivalent of at least 100 Euros to obtain a cell phone       plan with at least 100 gigabytes of mobile data. Across much of the EU, that       kind of cell phone plan could be had for less than 40 Euros.              https://archive.is/LnFRL/822bcfe750687b1ef6288ee7df5606fd15629289.webp              Canadian telecoms charge more than 10 times as much for 100 gigabytes of       mobile data as companies in France or Ireland.              Canadian telecoms charge more than 10 times as much for 100 gigabytes of       mobile data as companies in France or Ireland. Photo by Rewheel              WE HAVE THE LOWEST RATE OF ACUTE CARE BEDS AMONG PEER COUNTRIES              Canada's health system was particularly walloped by COVID-19 due to the simple       fact that most of our hospitals are at the breaking point even in good times.       Multiple times during the pandemic, provinces were forced into shutdown by       rates of COVID that had barely been noticed in better-prepared countries. A       ranking by the Canadian Institute for Health Information provides one clue as       to why. When ranked against peer countries, Canada's rate of per-capita acute       care beds was in last place, albeit tied with Sweden. Canada has two acute              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca