XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: haggisz@hotmail.com   
      
   ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
   > On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:50:37 +1100, "Dechucka"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>  wrote in message   
   >> news:sshgl89t7qtihmu8v59ianojcgefn0667s@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 23:50:30 +1000, F Murtz    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:30:50 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "yaputya"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Here's somethingh the gun-nuts won't want to see....   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Shields told host Judy Woodruff, "You know, Judy, the reality is --   
   >>>>>>>> and it's a terrible reality -- since Robert Kennedy died in the   
   >>>>>>>> Ambassador Hotel on June 4, 1968, more Americans have died from   
   >>>>>>>> gunfire than died in . all the wars of this country's history, from   
   >>>>>>>> the Revolutionary through the Civil War, World War I, World War II,   
   >>>>>>>> in those 43 years. ... I mean, guns are a problem. And I think   
   >>>>>>>> they still have to be confronted."   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Is that counting the unarmed people that died at the hands of   
   >>>>>>> governments led by Stalin? Hitler? Mao? In Cambodia? In Africa?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> And what difference would it have made if they were armed, you dull-   
   >>>>>> witted gimp?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Probably a lot in those days,but not now with modern armoury   
   >>>   
   >>> That is open to debate. But you made the point - probably a lot in   
   >>> those days.   
   >>   
   >> but not today   
   >   
   > Why not?   
   >   
   Because you can have an army of individuals and do the lot in with a   
   remote controlled bomb   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)