ae8f23f6   
   XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: klausschadenfreude@yahoo.com   
      
   On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 04:19:31 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong   
    wrote:   
      
   >Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >> bringyagrogalong  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> > I agree that guns are a tool. The problem is with tools who have   
   >> > access to them.   
   >>   
   >> > The Second Amendment appreciated that fact, so limited the right to   
   >> > bear arms to an organised militia not individuals.   
   >>   
   >> It didn't.   
   >   
   >It did.   
      
   It didn't. Otherwise, it would have said " the right of the militia to   
   keep and bear arms."   
      
   >Which I guess is why you snipped it?   
      
   I snipped it because you're obviously too fucking stupid to read it   
   and understand it, so why bother leaving it?   
      
   >> Try reading it.   
   >   
   >I did.   
      
   But you don't understand it.   
      
   >It clearly stated that the right to bear arms was in the context of   
   >having an armed militia.   
      
   Wrong.   
      
   See above.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)