04a4ce92   
   XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: sofala@aapt.net.au   
      
   On Apr 7, 10:32 pm, ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:   
   > On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 03:41:42 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong>   
   >  wrote:   
   > >On Apr 7, 7:36 pm, ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:   
   > >> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 09:47:59 +1000, "Dechucka"    
   > >> wrote:>   
   > >> >"RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > >> >news:XnsA1995BF3AE915hopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   > >> >> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   > >> >>news:cLidnYKdRec8fMDMnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >   
   > >> >>> "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > >> >>>news:XnsA1986C1E2B82Ehopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   > >> >>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   > >> >>>>news:4pydnbR6TvEGB8HMnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>> "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > >> >>>>>news:XnsA197849972ED2hopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   > >> >>>>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   > >> >>>>>>news:usSdnbuI5bDxHcHMnZ2dnUVZ_r-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>> "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > >> >>>>>>>news:XnsA1976A8929D05hopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   > >> >>>>>>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   > >> >>>>>>>>news:vLmdnZ_J5ZTH4cbMnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>  wrote in message   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>news:etsml85f3qg0v9itca53q0ufgic1h4c0qa@4ax.com...   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:31:01 +1100, "Dechucka"   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote in message   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>news:8fckl896kma3pgt2merngcrlcrnf2njp1p@4ax.com...   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:50:37 +1100, "Dechucka"   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in message   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:sshgl89t7qtihmu8v59ianojcgefn0667s@4ax.com...   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 23:50:30 +1000, F Murtz   
   > >> >>>>>>    
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:30:50 -0700 (PDT),   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong  wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "yaputya"  wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's somethingh the gun-nuts won't want to see....   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shields told host Judy Woodruff, "You know, Judy, the   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reality is --   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it's a terrible reality -- since Robert Kennedy   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> died   
   > >> >>>> in   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Ambassador Hotel on June 4, 1968, more Americans   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have died from gunfire than died in . all the wars of   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this country's history, from   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Revolutionary through the Civil War, World War I,   
   > >> >>>> World   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> War II,   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in those 43 years. ... I mean, guns are a problem. And   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think they still have to be confronted."   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that counting the unarmed people that died at the   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hands   
   > >> >>>>>> of   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> governments led by Stalin? Hitler? Mao? In Cambodia? In   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Africa?   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what difference would it have made if they were   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> armed,   
   > >> >>>>>> you   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dull-   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> witted gimp?   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Probably a lot in those days,but not now with modern   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>armoury   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is open to debate. But you made the point - probably a   
   > >> >>>> lot   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in those days.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>but not today   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why not?   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>>>you against a Abrahams Tank (?)  ?   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>> I can stop it with a .22 pistol.....if one does it right.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>> lol   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>> He's right.  Kill the driver, the tank doesn't go anywhere.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>> doesn't the driver sit inside the tank with lots or armor around   
   > >> >>>>>>> her   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>> Until he or she has to shit or eat or bivuoac.  Never been around a   
   > >> >>>> tank   
   > >> >>>>>> command have you.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>> than you run in with your 22 and shoot them, lol   
   >   
   > >> >>>> Don't have to run in to shoot them.  Damn, I swear you are getting   
   > >> >>>> stupider every time you return to this newsgroup.   
   >   
   > >> >>>> Point is that sometime they have to come out of the tank or at least   
   > >> >>>> open the hatches.  This is a 9mm versus a tank:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>http://tinyurl.com/cerqg3   
   >   
   > >> >>> see previous post about how redundant Armour is if your brilliant   
   > >> >>> tactics are effective   
   >   
   > >> >> Don't have to.  I already showed you a 9mm besting a tank operator.   
   >   
   > >> >lol. You claim that arnour is redundant because of a 9mm   
   >   
   > >> No - his claim - and mine - is that a tank is vulnerable. Everything   
   > >> is - tank, aircraft, vehicles - and people.   
   >   
   > > But certainly not vulnerable to a .22 or a 9mm you demented halfwit.   
   >   
   > I see you have failed to follow the thread.   
   >   
   > Let's make it real simple for you.   
   >   
   > Who drives the tank?   
      
   The driver, doofus.   
      
   A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an armed crew.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)