8753bfe7   
   XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: sofala@aapt.net.au   
      
   RD Sandman  wrote:   
   > "Dechucka"  wrote:   
   > > "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > >> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   > >>> "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > >>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> It was a moronic comment and we all know it. On that basis you   
   > >>>>>>> don't need a gun a cricket bat will do or a piece of fruit ( see   
   > >>>>>>> Monty Python)   
   >   
   > >>>>>> Sooner or later, those in fortified positions have to come out.   
   >   
   > >>>>> in tanks?   
   >   
   > >>>> You think tank operators are welded in place?   
   >   
   > >>> you think they pack a picnic and sit around in the daisies having   
   > >>> lunch by themselves?   
   >   
   > >> Why do you keep going back to armored columns and such when that   
   > >> wasn't even part of the scenario?   
   >   
   > > the scenario was civilians against the US military and morons claiming   
   > > they could take them on   
   >   
   > Not when I joined the thread and I believe I was in it before you were.   
   > At least it was quite awhile before I even saw a post from you.  If it   
   > had been about a person with a .22 taking on an armored division (which   
   > is the scenario you guys are running with, I would have stayed out.  I   
   > wouldn't have posted the scenario of a cop taking out a tank with a 9mm   
   > by killing the driver.   
      
   We wished you hadn't posted it because it was totally irrelevant to   
   the point of absurdity.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)