7632a2d7   
   XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: sofala@aapt.net.au   
      
   "Dechucka"  wrote:   
   > "GOP_Decline_and_Fall"  wrote:   
   > > RD Sandman babbled:   
   > >> GOP_Decline_and_Fall  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The idea that a gun nut can single handedly take on and defeat US Army   
   > >>> column of tanks with a pea shooter is a classic example of the   
   > >>> delusional gun nuttery the article discusses.   
   >   
   > >> Ahhhhh, so in your mind one person with a gun (a .22 when this started)   
   > >> and *one* tank with a driver, is now going to be helpless against a US   
   > >> Army column of tanks?  Why are you moving the goalposts so fucking far?   
   >   
   > > The US military is an organization in communication.   
   > > The idea of a lone tank is a chimera, as is the idea  that an Abrams   
   > > tank an be stopped by a gun hobbyist with a pistol.   
   >   
   > > If they weren't machine gunned by the tank crew, a helicopter gun ship   
   > > would be called in to promptly dispatch them.   
   >   
   > The Apaches have already been taken out by ozarfart and his mighty .22   
      
   The US is reconsidering it's entire military strategy.   
      
   They intend mothballing their entire fighter aircraft fleet and will   
   instead send soldiers armed with .22's to any warring nation to wait   
   for pilots to leave their cockpits.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)