XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Dev@null.net   
      
   On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 05:32:47 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 01:20:55 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:10:35 +1000, "Spartan613"    
   >>wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>"GOP_Decline_and_Fall"  wrote in message   
   >>>news:v4e7m89122u7u38ujnsrorbme1ssn435gq@4ax.com...   
   >>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:10:20 +1000, "Spartan613"    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>"Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:Zs2dnYnnuZw1rP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Spartan613"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:d1q8t.424$EY1.33@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...   
   >>>>>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:JZKdnUQqB7XogP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Scout"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:kjt5u9$out$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "bringyagrogalong"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> news:b2538c35-7ef7-4d01-83ed-c6d86cf39c81@y12g2000yqb.   
   ooglegroups.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an armed   
   >>>>>>>>>>> > crew.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Really?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Really? A .22 won't go through an open hatch or hit a member of the   
   >>>>>>>>> tank crew outside of the tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting the crew is going to spend their whole enlistment   
   >>>>>>>>> inside that tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Going to get pretty rip in there after about 3 days.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I don't know but with armour vehicles in say Afghanistan the crews   
   >>>>>>>> don't   
   >>>>>>>> seem to be taken out by 22s that often. Maybe because they go back to   
   >>>>>>>> a   
   >>>>>>>> secure base or bivouac   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Feel free to contribute when you have a clue.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> the argument is to difficult for you to argue isn't it   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>To the contrary, I've been in this caper on and off since 1979.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>What have you ever done?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It wouldn't matter if you were General Patton, you do NOT take out   
   >>>> Abrams tanks with .22 pistols.   
   >>>   
   >>>Not the tanks you don't. No.   
   >>>   
   >>>Where did anyone say they were going to destroy a tank with a .22?   
   >>   
   >>Memory problems?   
   >>ozarkheart boasted he could take out an Abrams tank with a .22 pistol.   
   >   
   >And I defined 'take out' ....   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>As modern Abraham tanks are totally sealed with remote weapons systems   
   >>and video display  I guess we are back to murdering off-duty tank   
   >>drivers relaxing in a bar are we?   
   >   
   >That is certainly one way to do it.   
      
   To do what?   
      
   Murdering a patron at a bar because he is an off duty tank driver is   
   light years from taking out a Abrams tank.   
      
   >Now you are stating to catch on.......   
      
      
   >However, we can have a side debate on your use of the term "murder".   
      
   What would you call it?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)