XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Dev@null.net   
      
   On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 05:34:21 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:16:55 +1000, "Dechucka"    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>"Spartan613"  wrote in message   
   >>news:_aP8t.473$EY1.158@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...   
   >>> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:HKGdnUfVbveCJv7MnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Spartan613"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:khO8t.413$e66.328@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...   
   >>>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:Zs2dnYnnuZw1rP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Spartan613"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:d1q8t.424$EY1.33@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...   
   >>>>>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:JZKdnUQqB7XogP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Scout"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:kjt5u9$out$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "bringyagrogalong"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> news:b2538c35-7ef7-4d01-83ed-c6d86cf39c81@y12g2000yqb.   
   ooglegroups.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an armed   
   >>>>>>>>>>> > crew.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Really?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Really? A .22 won't go through an open hatch or hit a member of the   
   >>>>>>>>> tank crew outside of the tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting the crew is going to spend their whole enlistment   
   >>>>>>>>> inside that tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Going to get pretty rip in there after about 3 days.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I don't know but with armour vehicles in say Afghanistan the crews   
   >>>>>>>> don't seem to be taken out by 22s that often. Maybe because they go   
   >>>>>>>> back to a secure base or bivouac   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Feel free to contribute when you have a clue.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> the argument is to difficult for you to argue isn't it   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> To the contrary, I've been in this caper on and off since 1979.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Taking on tanks with .22s ?. Come on the poms would have given you better   
   >>>> ideas than that   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What have you ever done?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> heaps of stuff but what is your point?   
   >>>   
   >>> That your "heaps of stuff" hasn't prepared you for the things you so often   
   >>> stick your interfering totalitarian nose into.   
   >>   
   >>seems they have. I'm not arguing that a .22 can take on a tank like you are   
   >   
   >Still missing it, upchuck.   
   >   
   >I do not know how many times I have to say it before you understand.   
   >   
   >You kill/wound the crew......   
      
   Not in a modern Abrams you don't.   
   As has already been stated they are impregnable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)