XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Dev@null.net   
      
   On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 05:40:34 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:32:07 +1000, "Dechucka"    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> wrote in message   
   >>news:1mp6m85tdkbdbh0vp0mg8oblqndbiia9f0@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:16:37 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>"Dechucka"  wrote in   
   >>>>news:FYKdnW_a48B2t_7MnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:hsa5m89hjhhtmh8acfu7s1qqi9v920o0ip@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:26:36 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> >>   
   >>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an armed   
   >>>>>>>> > crew.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Really?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Nobody here was talking about shooting tanks with .22's?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> that is what this discussion is about ozark taking on the US armour   
   >>>>> with his .22   
   >>>>   
   >>>>No, it wasn't.   
   >>>   
   >>> It started off on something different but morphed into this   
   >>> discussion. upchucka cannot imagine anything but a scenario he puts   
   >>> up. The concept of unconventional warfare completely eludes him.   
   >>>   
   >>> I suspect his experience is limited to comic books and the occasional   
   >>> war movie.   
   >>   
   >>you against the US military as domestic terrorists? you'd be screwed.   
   >   
   >maybe - maybe not.  Your thinking is so limited.   
   >   
   >   
   >>Actually probably wouldn't bother with the military they'd take you out with   
   >>the cops who are better armed and protected than you   
   >   
   >Being "better armed" does not insure success......   
      
   So now you are going to overthrow the United States government with a   
   .22 pistol.   
      
   How old are you six?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)