XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Dev@null.net   
      
   On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:47:37 -0500, RD Sandman   
    wrote:   
      
   >GOP_Decline_and_Fall  wrote in   
   >news:0au7m81e5rpl55ob9b7gpj939nn38468h5@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 05:40:34 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:32:07 +1000, "Dechucka"    
   >>>wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> wrote in message   
   >>>>news:1mp6m85tdkbdbh0vp0mg8oblqndbiia9f0@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:16:37 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>"Dechucka"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>news:FYKdnW_a48B2t_7MnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> message news:hsa5m89hjhhtmh8acfu7s1qqi9v920o0ip@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:26:36 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> >>   
   >>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an   
   >>>>>>>>>> > armed crew.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Really?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Nobody here was talking about shooting tanks with .22's?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> that is what this discussion is about ozark taking on the US   
   >>>>>>> armour with his .22   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>No, it wasn't.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It started off on something different but morphed into this   
   >>>>> discussion. upchucka cannot imagine anything but a scenario he puts   
   >>>>> up. The concept of unconventional warfare completely eludes him.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I suspect his experience is limited to comic books and the   
   >>>>> occasional war movie.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>you against the US military as domestic terrorists? you'd be screwed.   
   >>>   
   >>>maybe - maybe not.  Your thinking is so limited.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Actually probably wouldn't bother with the military they'd take you   
   >>>>out with the cops who are better armed and protected than you   
   >>>   
   >>>Being "better armed" does not insure success......   
   >>   
   >> So now you are going to overthrow the United States government with a   
   >> .22 pistol.   
   >   
   >Just where did he make that claim?  In your head?   
      
   You just quoted it.   
      
   >>you against the US military as domestic terrorists? you'd be screwed.   
      
   >maybe - maybe not.   
      
   >   
   >> How old are you six?   
   >>   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)