XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: nospam@buggeroff.com   
      
   "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   news:e5ednTZuSP567vnMnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >   
   >  wrote in message   
   > news:0iq7m89sldmh2vog4hujt39vsuoajqg0d8@4ax.com...   
   >> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:34:11 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:13:45 +1000, "Spartan613"    
   >>>wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>"Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:x-OdnWkvRtgXrf_MnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "Spartan613"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:95q8t.380$e66.153@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...   
   >>>>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:88KdnUa-icl1v__MnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Spartan613"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:xmp8t.416$EY1.277@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...   
   >>>>>>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:OuOdnRNnoOyNdfzMnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> news:XnsA19B6AD3F5063hopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>> news:laadnagdVffILv3MnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a moronic comment and we all know it. On that basis you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> don't   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> need a gun a cricket bat will do or a piece of fruit ( see   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Monty   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Python)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Sooner or later, those in fortified positions have to come out.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> in tanks?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You think tank operators are welded in place?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> you think they pack a picnic and sit around in the daisies having   
   >>>>>>>>> lunch by themselves?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You're a fucking idiot. (We knew that already, of course).   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Tank crews get out of their tanks OUTSIDE fortified positions when   
   >>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>> need arises.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That usually happens not long after the sun goes down and they   
   >>>>>>>> harbour-up for the night and start slinging hammocks off the   
   >>>>>>>> vehicles,   
   >>>>>>>> brew up and make an evening meal .   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Oh you mean in a protected bivouac   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Define "protected", dickhead.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> FYI, we don't put up bullet proof screens between the vehicles.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> and you don't just park your tanks and have a kip without a defensive   
   >>>>> perimeter.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>No.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Come on even the humble foot soldier has a defensive perimeter   
   >>>>   
   >>>>And when they make them utterly impregnable, the kevlar makers will be   
   >>>>out   
   >>>>of business.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Until then.....   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Dickhead, obviously you've lived in the field with a tank Troop.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Why the fuck do you insist on making comments on things you clearly   
   >>>>>>>> know fuck-all about?!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You were out protecting the tank crews were you?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No, I was a member of an AFV crew. Clown.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> so when you were bunkering down you all put your hammocks out and went   
   >>>>> to   
   >>>>> sleep?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Why the fuck else would anyone harbour-up and set up their gonk gear?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Why do you insist of commenting on things you know fuck-all about?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Seems you have pathological condition for it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Maybe when they were outside their vehicles? Did you feel in danger   
   >>>>>>> from   
   >>>>>>> a civilian with a 22 pistol or did you take precautions   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The danger can come from any number of things.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> the .22 is what we are discussing   
   >>>>   
   >>>>The .22 can be a dangerous weapon in the right hands.   
   >>>   
   >>>Dangerous to an Abrams tank?   
   >>>LOL!   
   >>   
   >> Indeed. How does that tank work with a dead crew?   
   >   
   > you get a new one   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>If they weren't, no military forces would employ them.   
   >>>   
   >>>No military employs .22 pistols to attack Abraham tanks, the idea is   
   >>>insane.   
   >>   
   >> It is - but that isn't what I am talking about. Do pay attention.   
   >>   
   >> What seems to be your problem - as well as upchucks - is focusing on   
   >> the tank. It is a lump of metal without a crew.   
   >>   
   >> And a .22 (and I am not specifying a pistol) is very effective against   
   >> a person.   
   >>   
   >> Get the idea?   
   >   
   > I realize that is lucky that others have not come up with your brilliant   
   > idea before thus making tanks redundant Now tell us how you will disable   
   > the USS Ronald Reagan with your .22   
      
   That statement just proves you have the intellectual horsepower of a rubber   
   band.   
      
   The discussion has moved beyond your "technical expertise" (you have   
   fuck-all) and now you're deploying the Leftard tactic of ridiculous   
   strawmen, to sway the argument away from the one you've already lost.   
      
   Loser.   
      
   --   
   "There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not   
   want merely because you think it would be good for him".   
      
   Robert A. Heinlein.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)