XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: nospam@buggeroff.com
"Dechucka" wrote in message
news:UJqdnQBpzLLMHPnMnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>
> wrote in message
> news:njr7m81qprf1jga3gug93ou7fprdi28qcj@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:16:55 +1000, "Dechucka"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Spartan613" wrote in message
>>>news:_aP8t.473$EY1.158@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>>>> news:HKGdnUfVbveCJv7MnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Spartan613" wrote in message
>>>>> news:khO8t.413$e66.328@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Zs2dnYnnuZw1rP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Spartan613" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:d1q8t.424$EY1.33@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>>>> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:JZKdnUQqB7XogP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Scout" wrote in
>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>> news:kjt5u9$out$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:b2538c35-7ef7-4d01-83ed-c6d86cf39c81@y12g2000yqb
googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an armed
>>>>>>>>>>>> > crew.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Really? A .22 won't go through an open hatch or hit a member of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> tank crew outside of the tank?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting the crew is going to spend their whole
>>>>>>>>>> enlistment
>>>>>>>>>> inside that tank?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Going to get pretty rip in there after about 3 days.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know but with armour vehicles in say Afghanistan the crews
>>>>>>>>> don't seem to be taken out by 22s that often. Maybe because they
>>>>>>>>> go
>>>>>>>>> back to a secure base or bivouac
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Feel free to contribute when you have a clue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the argument is to difficult for you to argue isn't it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To the contrary, I've been in this caper on and off since 1979.
>>>>>
>>>>> Taking on tanks with .22s ?. Come on the poms would have given you
>>>>> better
>>>>> ideas than that
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What have you ever done?
>>>>>
>>>>> heaps of stuff but what is your point?
>>>>
>>>> That your "heaps of stuff" hasn't prepared you for the things you so
>>>> often
>>>> stick your interfering totalitarian nose into.
>>>
>>>seems they have. I'm not arguing that a .22 can take on a tank like you
>>>are
>>
>> Still missing it, upchuck.
>>
>> I do not know how many times I have to say it before you understand.
>>
>> You kill/wound the crew......
>
> which won't happen, next
I love the way these Leftard fuckwits speak with such certainty on things
they know fuck-all about.
--
"There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not
want merely because you think it would be good for him".
Robert A. Heinlein.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
