XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: nospam@buggeroff.com   
      
   "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   news:yu-dnQD-j7U6FfnMnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >   
   > "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > news:XnsA19D8AD20D781hopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   >> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   >> news:jZmdnSj0FMyS6vnMnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> snip   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> inside a nice defensive   or back at base. You don't seriously think   
   >>>>> they will be out in the open without defenses   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That depends on the tank.  If it develops trouble or not.   
   >>>   
   >>> Oh my god the scenarios keep changing   
   >>   
   >> I didn't even change a scenario.  You are going insane.   
   >>   
   >>> Once again the lone tank breaking down ,the crew getting out to kick   
   >>> the treads and ozarfart just happening to be there with his .22 pistol   
   >>> against a crew who just happened to forget their personal weapons or   
   >>> haven't got the 50mm manned is moronic   
   >>   
   >> I didn't say Ozark could do it.  I gave no scenario where it could occur.   
   >> I only said you could stop a tank if you could kill its driver.  That is   
   >> true.  In some unique situation you may be able to do that.  That is also   
   >> true.   
   >   
   > killing the driver would not stop the tank as you will find that other   
   > crew members are capable of at least moving the vehicle, well that is how   
   > it used to be   
      
   "used to be"? As in when you did it?   
      
   Now who's the fucking Walter Mitty?   
      
   Fucking flogbag.   
      
   --   
   "There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not   
   want merely because you think it would be good for him".   
      
   Robert A. Heinlein.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)