XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: Dev@null.net
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:36:47 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:
>On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:06:01 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 05:32:47 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 01:20:55 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:10:35 +1000, "Spartan613"
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"GOP_Decline_and_Fall" wrote in message
>>>>>news:v4e7m89122u7u38ujnsrorbme1ssn435gq@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:10:20 +1000, "Spartan613"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Dechucka" wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:Zs2dnYnnuZw1rP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Spartan613" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:d1q8t.424$EY1.33@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>>>>> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:JZKdnUQqB7XogP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Scout" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:kjt5u9$out$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:b2538c35-7ef7-4d01-83ed-c6d86cf39c81@y12g2000yq
.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an armed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > crew.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Really? A .22 won't go through an open hatch or hit a member of the
>>>>>>>>>>> tank crew outside of the tank?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting the crew is going to spend their whole
enlistment
>>>>>>>>>>> inside that tank?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Going to get pretty rip in there after about 3 days.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't know but with armour vehicles in say Afghanistan the crews
>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>> seem to be taken out by 22s that often. Maybe because they go back
to
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> secure base or bivouac
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Feel free to contribute when you have a clue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the argument is to difficult for you to argue isn't it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>To the contrary, I've been in this caper on and off since 1979.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What have you ever done?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It wouldn't matter if you were General Patton, you do NOT take out
>>>>>> Abrams tanks with .22 pistols.
>>>>>
>>>>>Not the tanks you don't. No.
>>>>>
>>>>>Where did anyone say they were going to destroy a tank with a .22?
>>>>
>>>>Memory problems?
>>>>ozarkheart boasted he could take out an Abrams tank with a .22 pistol.
>>>
>>>And I defined 'take out' ....
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>As modern Abraham tanks are totally sealed with remote weapons systems
>>>>and video display I guess we are back to murdering off-duty tank
>>>>drivers relaxing in a bar are we?
>>>
>>>That is certainly one way to do it.
>>
>>To do what?
>>
>>Murdering a patron at a bar because he is an off duty tank driver is
>>light years from taking out a Abrams tank.
>
>Not quite that far.. and it has happened.
Then you will have no trouble providing a cite for an Abrams tank ever
being "taken out" by a .22 pistol by murdering an off duty driver.
,crickets>
>>
>>>Now you are stating to catch on.......
>>
>>
>>>However, we can have a side debate on your use of the term "murder".
>>
>>What would you call it?
>
>Killing an enemy soldier.
Since when is the US Government your enemy that you are at war with?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
