XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Dev@null.net   
      
   On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:36:31 -0500, RD Sandman   
    wrote:   
      
   >GOP_Decline_and_Fall  wrote in   
   >news:1bs9m81sdt0u7lrlnrs6stegen9le23nb2@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:47:37 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>GOP_Decline_and_Fall  wrote in   
   >>>news:0au7m81e5rpl55ob9b7gpj939nn38468h5@4ax.com:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 05:40:34 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:32:07 +1000, "Dechucka" @hotmail.com>   
   >>>>>wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> wrote in message   
   >>>>>>news:1mp6m85tdkbdbh0vp0mg8oblqndbiia9f0@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:16:37 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>"Dechucka"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>news:FYKdnW_a48B2t_7MnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>> message news:hsa5m89hjhhtmh8acfu7s1qqi9v920o0ip@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:26:36 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong   
   >>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> > armed crew.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Really?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Nobody here was talking about shooting tanks with .22's?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> that is what this discussion is about ozark taking on the US   
   >>>>>>>>> armour with his .22   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>No, it wasn't.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It started off on something different but morphed into this   
   >>>>>>> discussion. upchucka cannot imagine anything but a scenario he   
   >puts   
   >>>>>>> up. The concept of unconventional warfare completely eludes him.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I suspect his experience is limited to comic books and the   
   >>>>>>> occasional war movie.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>you against the US military as domestic terrorists? you'd be   
   >screwed.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>maybe - maybe not.  Your thinking is so limited.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>Actually probably wouldn't bother with the military they'd take you   
   >>>>>>out with the cops who are better armed and protected than you   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Being "better armed" does not insure success......   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So now you are going to overthrow the United States government with a   
   >>>> .22 pistol.   
   >>>   
   >>>Just where did he make that claim?  In your head?   
   >>   
   >> You just quoted it.   
   >   
   >Which statement above says he is going to overthrow the US government   
   >with a .22 pistol?  I am sorry, but I can't find it.   
      
   You just snipped instead of answering   
      
   >>you against the US military as domestic terrorists? you'd be screwed.   
      
   >maybe - maybe not.   
      
   What else does that mean in this context?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)