XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Dev@null.net   
      
   On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:48:31 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
      
   >On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:49:08 +1000, "Dechucka"   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>"RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   >>news:XnsA19D77DCA55E9hopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   >>> "Dechucka"  wrote in   
   >>> news:iN2dnQh2BugC8v7MnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:1mp6m85tdkbdbh0vp0mg8oblqndbiia9f0@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:16:37 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>"Dechucka"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>news:FYKdnW_a48B2t_7MnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> message news:hsa5m89hjhhtmh8acfu7s1qqi9v920o0ip@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:26:36 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> >>   
   >>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an armed   
   >>>>>>>>>> > crew.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Really?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Nobody here was talking about shooting tanks with .22's?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> that is what this discussion is about ozark taking on the US armour   
   >>>>>>> with his .22   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>No, it wasn't.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It started off on something different but morphed into this   
   >>>>> discussion. upchucka cannot imagine anything but a scenario he puts   
   >>>>> up. The concept of unconventional warfare completely eludes him.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I suspect his experience is limited to comic books and the occasional   
   >>>>> war movie.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> you against the US military as domestic terrorists? you'd be screwed.   
   >>>   
   >>> Much of the military agrees with us and much of us are ex-military.  Does   
   >>> that mean anything in the bigger picture?  Who knows, I don't wish to   
   >>> find out because of what it would mean to the country.   
   >>>   
   >>>> Actually probably wouldn't bother with the military they'd take you   
   >>>> out with the cops who are better armed and protected than you   
   >>>   
   >>> Hmmmm, then why are most police departments whining about outgunned by   
   >>> the street gangs?   
   >>   
   >>Sorry I assumed   
   >   
   >You are making a lot of ill-founded assumptions   
   >   
   >   
   >> that ozarfart was a law abiding citizen well until he   
   >>decides to murder tank crews in bars with his trusty .22   
   >   
   >Killing a tank crew when one is at war is "murder"?   
      
   You are at war with the US government?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)