XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Dev@null.net   
      
   On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:21:39 +1000, "Dechucka"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Spartan613"  wrote in message   
   >news:aAr9t.482$e66.402@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...   
   >> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >> news:ypCdnfYvWOYj3fvMnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>   
   >>> "Spartan613"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:yGq9t.473$e66.362@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...   
   >>>> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> I realize that is lucky that others have not come up with your   
   >>>>> brilliant idea before thus making tanks redundant Now tell us how you   
   >>>>> will disable the USS Ronald Reagan with your .22   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That statement just proves you have the intellectual horsepower of a   
   >>>> rubber band.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The discussion has moved beyond your "technical expertise" (you have   
   >>>> fuck-all) and now you're deploying the Leftard tactic of ridiculous   
   >>>> strawmen, to sway the argument away from the one you've already lost.   
   >>>   
   >>> why? it is just as inane an idea as stopping the Abrams with his .22 and   
   >>> based on the same flawed principle   
   >>   
   >> Sorry.   
   >>   
   >> The discussion is about disabling a tank by attacking the crew.   
   >>   
   >> A pity you know fuck all about tanks and unconventional warfare tactics,   
   >> isn't it?   
   >   
   >LOL, this is one of the funniest threads I ever been involved. I couldn't of   
   >imagined that anybody esp. someone who claims tank experience would support   
   >his claims.   
      
   You has just exposed himself as just another lame right wing troll.   
   Probably one of these sad cases that get 25 cents a post.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)