XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: nospam@buggeroff.com
"GOP_Decline_and_Fall" wrote in message
news:qpkcm8942o7iataggs0v8jg70g3aour1c0@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:57:08 +1000, "Spartan613"
> wrote:
>
>>"GOP_Decline_and_Fall" wrote in message
>>news:qdj7m81d9gfn8trgtpmpb114je2hh0a2hv@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:10:35 +1000, "Spartan613"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"GOP_Decline_and_Fall" wrote in message
>>>>news:v4e7m89122u7u38ujnsrorbme1ssn435gq@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:10:20 +1000, "Spartan613"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Dechucka" wrote in message
>>>>>>news:Zs2dnYnnuZw1rP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Spartan613" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:d1q8t.424$EY1.33@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>>>> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:JZKdnUQqB7XogP_MnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Scout" wrote in
>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>> news:kjt5u9$out$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:b2538c35-7ef7-4d01-83ed-c6d86cf39c81@y12g2000yqb
googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an armed
>>>>>>>>>>>> > crew.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Really? A .22 won't go through an open hatch or hit a member of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> tank crew outside of the tank?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting the crew is going to spend their whole
>>>>>>>>>> enlistment
>>>>>>>>>> inside that tank?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Going to get pretty rip in there after about 3 days.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know but with armour vehicles in say Afghanistan the crews
>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>> seem to be taken out by 22s that often. Maybe because they go back
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> secure base or bivouac
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Feel free to contribute when you have a clue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the argument is to difficult for you to argue isn't it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>To the contrary, I've been in this caper on and off since 1979.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What have you ever done?
>>>>>
>>>>> It wouldn't matter if you were General Patton, you do NOT take out
>>>>> Abrams tanks with .22 pistols.
>>>>
>>>>Not the tanks you don't. No.
>>>>
>>>>Where did anyone say they were going to destroy a tank with a .22?
>>>
>>> Memory problems?
>>> ozarkheart boasted he could take out an Abrams tank with a .22 pistol.
>>
>>You can't destroy a tank that way. The crew, however.
>>
>>> As modern Abraham tanks are totally sealed with remote weapons systems
>>> and video display I guess we are back to murdering off-duty tank
>>> drivers relaxing in a bar are we?
>>
>>Tank crews unbutton the hatches most of the time, unless they're actually
>>under attack. It's just easier to maintain situational awareness that way.
>
> Bullshit.
What's you experience in tanks? What unit?
> All the situational awareness need is totally electronic
And they work ALL the time and cover EVERY angle too.
>>You've never been an AFV crewman, have you?
>>
>>Have you ever even been in a tank?
>
> Clearly you know absolutely NOTHING about an Abrams tank.
What unit were you in?
--
"There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not
want merely because you think it would be good for him".
Robert A. Heinlein.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
