XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: nospam@buggeroff.com
"Dechucka" wrote in message
news:r86dnXou1LXryPvMnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>
> "Spartan613" wrote in message
> news:rqs9t.548$EY1.107@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
>> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>> news:M_CdnQveI7cL0_vMnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "Spartan613" wrote in message
>>> news:ZTr9t.486$e66.258@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>>>> news:fLednWhSrOTJ2PvMnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Spartan613" wrote in message
>>>>> news:75r9t.481$e66.228@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>> Like when they dismount, or drive with hatches open (a common
>>>>>> practice to improve SA and crew comfort).
>>>>>
>>>>> be a good shot with his .22 to get between all the Kevlar, they also
>>>>> may batten down when GI-O and his .22 approach
>>>>
>>>> Like being a good shot is difficult, or something.
>>>
>>> no but given he is using a .22 pistol against a moving target
>>
>> Not that it matters, but who said it was moving?
>>
>> I can hit moving targets.
>>
>> I'll take a static one when it's on offer, moving when I have to.
>
> makes it difficult a long shot missing the Kevlar on the tank commander or
> driver who in a tactical situation be battened down anyhow. All the SA
> being supplied via scopes or electronically.
>
> BTW the newer Abrams tanks are air conditioned, not for crew comfort but
> for the electronics
Thanks for that, Captain Obvious.
Gee, your wikipedia account has had a flogging today.
--
"There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not
want merely because you think it would be good for him".
Robert A. Heinlein.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
