XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,
talk.politics.guns
From: sid9@
"FirstPost" wrote in message
news:8vdem8914ekqmi4teocd0fdn7n1lpkfoqq@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:09:51 -0500, David Hartung
> wrote:
>
>>On 04/11/2013 05:04 PM, wy wrote:
>>> On 11 Apr, 17:56, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 04/11/2013 03:27 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "David Hartung" wrote in message
>>>>> news:4bednRQ-eqZBnvrMnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>> On 04/11/2013 01:24 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>>>>>> "David Hartung" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:OPWdnTWvAtVvYPvMnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>>>> On 04/11/2013 01:13 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "David Hartung" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:QuedndquSM7ZZPvMnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>>> Senator Roger Wicker(R MS) voted in favor of cloture today, which
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> move the unconstitutional and unconscionable gun bill forward to
>>>>>>>>>> floor
>>>>>>>>>> debate. Should this bill become law, more innocent people will
>>>>>>>>>> die
>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>> the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves will
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>> further curtailed.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not to worry.
>>>>>>>>> The proposed legislation is crap.
>>>>>>>>> It's loaded with NRA loopholes and escape clauses.
>>>>>>>>> Nothing effective will come out of this congress
>>>>
>>>>>>>> This from the man who would prefer to see the American Citizen
>>>>>>>> completely
>>>>>>>> disarmed.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Not true.
>>>>>>> Or correctly, you lie.
>>>>
>>>>>>> I have never advocated the total removal of arms from America.
>>>>>>> It can't be done.
>>>>>>> No laws or regulations can do that.
>>>>>>> That's an NRA boogie man.
>>>>
>>>>>>> There are an estimated 300,000,000 firearms in the USA.
>>>>>>> There are 12 million undocumented aliens in the USA.
>>>>
>>>>>>> We can't find either.
>>>>
>>>>>>> What we need is some non-IRA sanity in firearm regulation.
>>>>
>>>>>>> .....but 20 dead children and six dead adults are not enough yet to
>>>>>>> treat
>>>>>>> this issue rationally
>>>>
>>>>>> You speak of rationality, yet you have yet to advance a single
>>>>>> rational explanation of how the laws currently under consideration
>>>>>> will prevent another Sandy Hook.
>>>>
>>>>> 1. much smaller magazines would have saved lives in allowing some of
>>>>> the
>>>>> victims to escape.
>>>>
>>>> Really? You can support this with objective documentation?
>>>
>>> Simple math. One gun with six shots would kill 6 kids. One gun with
>>> 30 shots would kill 30 kids. Boy, you're stupid.
>>
>>Which is not proof. How about providing some of this documentation Sud
>>says you post.
>
> One gun with 4 10 round clips can kill 40 kids as it takes under 2
> seconds to eject a clip, insert a loaded one and immediately begin
> firing again without even having to recock the weapon.
> Boy, wy really is stupid.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Maybe true in practice firings.
More likely not true in the emotional high of killing children and their
teachers.
There's no hope with a large magazine.
There' a slight chance to escape when reloading is required
Some chance is better than no chance for the victims
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
