XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: Dev@null.net
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:19:31 -0500, RD Sandman
wrote:
>GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote in
>news:28gcm8tp2b363eblimi3qfp7iiegnga6ct@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:36:31 -0500, RD Sandman
>> wrote:
>>
>>>GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote in
>>>news:1bs9m81sdt0u7lrlnrs6stegen9le23nb2@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:47:37 -0500, RD Sandman
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote in
>>>>>news:0au7m81e5rpl55ob9b7gpj939nn38468h5@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 05:40:34 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:32:07 +1000, "Dechucka" >>@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:1mp6m85tdkbdbh0vp0mg8oblqndbiia9f0@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:16:37 -0500, RD Sandman
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Dechucka" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>news:FYKdnW_a48B2t_7MnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> message news:hsa5m89hjhhtmh8acfu7s1qqi9v920o0ip@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:26:36 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bringyagrogalong wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Who drives the tank?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The driver, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > A driver in an impregnable environment surrounded by an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > armed crew.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Impregnable?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yep! Certainly as far as a .22 is concerned.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody here was talking about shooting tanks with .22's?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that is what this discussion is about ozark taking on the US
>>>>>>>>>>> armour with his .22
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>No, it wasn't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It started off on something different but morphed into this
>>>>>>>>> discussion. upchucka cannot imagine anything but a scenario he
>>>puts
>>>>>>>>> up. The concept of unconventional warfare completely eludes him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I suspect his experience is limited to comic books and the
>>>>>>>>> occasional war movie.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>you against the US military as domestic terrorists? you'd be
>>>screwed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>maybe - maybe not. Your thinking is so limited.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Actually probably wouldn't bother with the military they'd take
>you
>>>>>>>>out with the cops who are better armed and protected than you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Being "better armed" does not insure success......
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So now you are going to overthrow the United States government with
>a
>>>>>> .22 pistol.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just where did he make that claim? In your head?
>>>>
>>>> You just quoted it.
>>>
>>>Which statement above says he is going to overthrow the US government
>>>with a .22 pistol? I am sorry, but I can't find it.
>>
>> You just snipped instead of answering
>
>Bullshit. I didn't snip anything.
My bad, you didn't snip it,you just ignored his tacit admission to
grandiose fantasies of domestic terrorism victories and asked where
they were .
>
>>>>you against the US military as domestic terrorists? you'd be screwed.
>>
>>>maybe - maybe not.
>>
>> What else does that mean in this context?
What else does that mean in this context?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
