home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.talk.guns      Discussion of gun ownership in Canada      54,497 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 52,791 of 54,497   
   wy to All   
   Re: Time for Mississippi to elect a new    
   13 Apr 13 10:44:08   
   
   0066a2b5   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   From: wy_@myself.com   
      
   On 13 Apr, 13:28, RD Sandman    
   wrote:   
   > wy  wrote innews:fcfbc689-5545-4ca4-9b33-4f29   
   4c99de7@r7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > > On 12 Apr, 22:51, "Scout"    
   > > wrote:   
   > >> "Sid9"  wrote in message   
   >   
   > >>news:kkaecf$qs7$1@dont-email.me...   
   >   
   > >> > "Wayne"  wrote in message   
   > >> >news:kka8hq$t31$1@dont-email.me...   
   >   
   > >> >> "FirstPost" wrote in message   
   > >> >>news:ir1hm85nj70s2gg4asbci8nkfis6c6cgpv@4ax.com...   
   >   
   > >> >> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:21:44 -0500, David Hartung   
   > >> >>  wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>On 04/12/2013 11:11 AM, Wayne wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>> "David Hartung" wrote in message   
   > >> >>>>news:W_ydnViZr5r-rfXMnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >   
   > >> >>>> On 04/12/2013 10:46 AM, FirstPost wrote:   
   > >> >>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:17:34 -0400, "Scout"   
   > >> >>>>>  wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>> "deep" wrote in message   
   > >> >>>>>>news:18gem8dakvucu3ohfuu4c2rvia5sb3ra1g@4ax.com...   
   > >> >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:27:15 -0500, FirstPost   
   > >> >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>> Simple math. One gun with six shots would kill 6 kids. O   
   > > ne gun   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>> with   
   > >> >>>>>>>>>> 30 shots would kill 30 kids. Boy, you're stupid.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>>> Which is not proof. How about providing some of this   
   > >> >>>>>>>>> documentat   
   > > ion   
   > >> >>>>>>>>> Sud   
   > >> >>>>>>>>> says you post.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>>> One gun with 4 10 round clips can kill 40 kids as it takes   
   > >> >>>>>>>> under   
   > >  2   
   > >> >>>>>>>> seconds to eject a clip, insert a loaded one and immediately   
   > >> >>>>>>>> beg   
   > > in   
   > >> >>>>>>>> firing again without even having to recock the weapon.   
   > >> >>>>>>>> Boy, wy really is stupid.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>>> Well, not exactly, so I guess it's you that's stupid. The   
   > >> >>>>>>> slid   
   > > e   
   > >> >>>>>>> will   
   > >> >>>>>>> be locked back and you have to actuate the slide release   
   > >> >>>>>>> lever so effectively it's the same amount of movement. And   
   > >> >>>>>>> it's during reloads   
   > >> >>>>>>> when people can get away, take cover, or somebody tackles   
   > >> >>>>>>> them.   
   > > Or   
   > >> >>>>>>> the shooter can drop his magazine even. Most people are   
   > >> >>>>>>> super   
   > > fast   
   > >> >>>>>>> speed shooting heros like you. Matter of fact, most spree   
   > >> >>>>>>> shoo   
   > > ters   
   > >> >>>>>>> are hardly trained at all.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>>> And yet, you claim that it takes tons of training to be able   
   > >> >>>>>> to ta   
   > > ke   
   > >> >>>>>> out a   
   > >> >>>>>> spree shooter.   
   >   
   > >> >>>>> I take my gun out and practice maybe once a year.   
   > >> >>>>> Ejecting a clip is a matter of pushing a button with your thumb   
   > >> >>>>> on   
   > > the   
   > >> >>>>> side of the gun and the clip pops out. Slappinng a new clip in   
   > >> >>>>> t   
   > > akes   
   > >> >>>>> about as long regardless of experience. The slide on the gun   
   > >> >>>>> re-engages with the flick of another small lever after the clip   
   > >> >>>>> is inserted and then it is just amattter of squeexing the   
   > >> >>>>> trigger. Taught my nephew how to to exactly that at the age of   
   > >> >>>>> 14. Took him all of 5 minutes to become proficient at it.   
   > >> >>>>> Until I bought my S&W 4006 back in 97 I had never used a semi   
   > >> >>>>> auto   
   > > in   
   > >> >>>>> my life. Always used a revolver before.   
   > >> >>>>> But then leave to a liberal to make something as simple as   
   > >> >>>>> wiping y   
   > > our   
   > >> >>>>> ass out to be some complex high skill task.   
   >   
   > >> >>>> # It has been many years since I last fired an M16, but the   
   > >> >>>> process   
   > > is   
   > >> >>>> # about the same. The bolt locks open when the last round is   
   > >> >>>> fired o   
   > > ut   
   > >> >>>> of   
   > >> >>>> # a clip. One button to drop the magazine out, slap another one   
   > >> >>>> in,   
   > > and   
   > >> >>>> # push another button to release the bolt, which chambers the   
   > >> >>>> next round   
   > >> >>>> # and cocks the weapon.   
   >   
   > >> >>>> # It would seem that most of our liberal brethren on this forum   
   > >> >>>> have   
   > >  no   
   > >> >>>> # idea how a weapon actually works.   
   >   
   > >> >>>> Quite true. The libtards operate on emotion only.   
   > >> >>>> And IMHO, a handgun magazine is easier to swap than a rifle.   
   >   
   > >> >>>> Also if a Sandy Hook type of incident is considered, the perp   
   > >> >>>> could have   
   > >> >>>> just blocked the door while taking a minute to swap magazines.   
   >   
   > >> >>>Once again the question becomes, what do our elected leaders truly   
   > >> >>>thi   
   > > nk   
   > >> >>>they will accomplish by throwing up additional roadblocks in front   
   > >> >>>of citizens who wish to own weapons?   
   >   
   > >> >>>A related question, how can our fellow citizens be so blind that   
   > >> >>>they cannot see that restricting the rights of law abiding   
   > >> >>>citizens does no   
   > > t   
   > >> >>>make them safer from criminals?   
   >   
   > >> >> # One of the Sandy Hook parents tried to make that exact point to   
   > >> >> the # government. More gun laws only make things more complicated   
   > >> >> and # difficult for those of us who obey laws. All the laws in   
   > >> >> the worl   
   > > d   
   > >> >> # aren't going to keep criminals from obtaining and using illegal   
   > >> >> # weapons. It's what makes them criminals, duh.   
   >   
   > >> >> And the people who will follow those insane laws are not the   
   > >> >> people wh   
   > > o   
   > >> >> are the problem.   
   >   
   > >> > We don't have a gun law that does not have the fingerprint of an   
   > >> > NRA loophole.   
   > >> > They are designed to be ineffective.   
   > >> > The new proposed law is ineffective.   
   > >> > Congress should not waste time on it.   
   > >> > Obama should not sign it.   
   > >> > It's bullshit   
   >   
   > >> So basically what you're telling me is that those opposed to guns   
   > >> can't craft reasonable legislation that fulfills their state   
   > >> objectives without producing objectionable violations of innocent   
   > >> people's rights.   
   >   
   > > What objectionable violations?  You'd still be able to own a gun.   
   >   
   > Not necssarily the ones I want.   
      
   You don't need nukes, drones, flame throwers or lasers, or even   
   something with 30 rounds.  That's just paranoid shit on your part.   
      
      
   >   
   > > What other rights are you talking about that the Constitution gives?   
   >   
   > The Constitution does not grant or give rights.  It recognizes them.   
      
   Recognizing a right is worth about as much as your spit in a bucket -   
   nothing.   
      
      
   >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca