XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   From: klausschadenfreude@yahoo.com   
      
   On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:17:50 -0500, David Hartung    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 04/13/2013 04:36 PM, wy wrote:   
   >> On 13 Apr, 17:05, RD Sandman    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>> In other words, you don't need a hi cap magazine for anything.   
   >>>   
   >>> So?  What does need have to do with it?  Do you need a V-8 or a V-6 in   
   >>> your car.  Do you even need a 4?   
   >>   
   >> When it comes to killing, need has everything to do with it?  How many   
   >> times and how quickly do you *need* to kill?   
   >   
   >Look at the wording of the Second Amendment, and then go back a learn   
   >what the founders had to say about it. The purpose of an armed citizenry   
   >is to protect the country from invaders, and if necessary, from the   
   >government itself. That being the purpose, does it not make sense that   
   >we arm ourselves with the expectation of facing soldiers who will be   
   >armed with automatic weapons and other nasty little surprises? IN such a   
   >scenario, limiting the size of clips, could mean more dead citizens.   
   >   
   >   
      
   But "assault weapons" *ARE* battlefield weapons. Haven't you heard?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)