1322819f   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "wy"  wrote in message   
   news:13624070-4ea5-4dfa-a6ec-ff358b146f9b@y14g2000vbk.googlegroups.com...   
   > On 14 Apr, 10:29, Klaus Schadenfreude    
   > wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 07:27:20 -0700 (PDT), wy  wrote:   
   >> >If it was only about people having the right, there would be no need   
   >> >to mention militia.  Boy, you're stupid.   
   >>   
   >> People make up the militia. Boy you're stupid.   
   >   
   > Then there's no need to mention militia if the people would already   
   > have the right to bear arms.   
      
   Unless one wanted to emphasis an extremely important reason why that right   
   needed to be protected.......   
      
   Oh, but you can't seem to get that far in your analysis.   
      
   Hell, you can't even seem to get past the lack of grammatical connection   
   between the nominative absolute clause and the main clause.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)