4ec2e6be
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,
talk.politics.guns
From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"wy" wrote in message
news:f1362119-b250-4e74-860f-0571b5815a8d@c7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
> On 15 Apr, 00:26, "Scout"
> wrote:
>> "wy" wrote in message
>>
>> news:ad66ac8c-36ca-43fd-9462-a2023d70d4d4@r7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 14 Apr, 22:50, "Scout"
>> > wrote:
>> >> "wy" wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:33613bd8-1f23-4e01-9a05-251ded765894@c15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On 14 Apr, 21:04, "Scout"
>> >> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> "wy" wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>news:b168afae-18a8-4ea9-9b74-e492c526af28@w1g2000vbw.goo
legroups.com...
>>
>> >> >> > On 14 Apr, 12:33, RD Sandman
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> wy wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:ad458066-16bb-4921-97e9-bd8ca06c42b4@f18g2000
bs.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On 14 Apr, 01:58, "Scout"
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> "wy" wrote in message
>>
>> >> >> >> >>news:927674ce-ac3d-4fbe-899d-3718991c46b0@e13g2000
bn.googlegroups.com
>> >> >> >> >> ...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On 13 Apr, 20:40, Steve wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 15:57:24 -0700 (PDT), wy
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >On 13 Apr, 18:50, "Scout"
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> "wy" wrote in message
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:5d978267-11aa-41d3-ab47-8b86c12119b4@c7
2000vbe.googlegroups
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>.co
>> >> >> >> > m...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 13 Apr, 18:17, David Hartung
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 04/13/2013 04:36 PM, wy wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 13 Apr, 17:05, RD Sandman
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > t>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> In other words, you don't need a hi cap magazine
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> for
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> anythin
>> >> >> >> > g.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So? What does need have to do with it? Do you
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> need a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> V-
>> >> >> >> > 8 or a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> V-6 in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> your car. Do you even need a 4?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > When it comes to killing, need has everything to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > do
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it?
>> >> >> >> > How
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > many
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > times and how quickly do you *need* to kill?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Look at the wording of the Second Amendment, and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> then
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> go
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> back a learn
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> what the founders had to say about it. The purpose
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> an
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> armed citizenry
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is to protect the country from invaders, and if
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> necessary,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> from
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> government itself. That being the purpose, does it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> not
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> make
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> sens
>> >> >> >> > e
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> we arm ourselves with the expectation of facing
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> soldiers
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> who
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wil
>> >> >> >> > l
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> be
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> armed with automatic weapons and other nasty little
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> surprises? I
>> >> >> >> > N
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> such a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> scenario, limiting the size of clips, could mean
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> more
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dead
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> citizens.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > America had a tiny army in the late 1700s, too tiny
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > cover
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the territory of the time. It wasn't even a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > full-fledged
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > nation ye
>> >> >> >> > t in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the ordinary sense. The second amendment gave the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > right
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > bea
>> >> >> >> > r
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > arms
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > for a militia to do the job of what the army couldn't
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > do
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the time.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The militias were a deputized form of the army.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > That's
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > what
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > th
>> >> >> >> > e
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > second amendment is all about. It wasn't about giving
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > every
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Jo
>> >> >> >> > e
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Blow
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > his gun just for the hell of it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> No, actually protecting the right of every Joe Blow to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> have
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> his
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> gun
>> >> >> >> > s
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> exactly the purpose of the 2nd.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> So that when the militia was needed Joe Blow could show
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> up
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> armed an
>> >> >> >> > d
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> able to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> perform his function in the militia.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Right. Within the function of a militia, not outside of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >it.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >The
>> >> >> >> >> >> >second amendment stipulates "militia," not one's
>> >> >> >> >> >> >backyard.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> There is no such stipulation in the Second Amendment.
>> >> >> >> >> >> There
>> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >> >> nothing in the 2A that suggests that the RKBA is limited
>> >> >> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> militia, MR i...@email.com
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security
>> >> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >> > a
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
