XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: user@domain.invalid   
      
   On 15/04/2013 3:50 PM, Spartan613 wrote:   
   > "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   > news:bJWdnfQrgPL3h_bMnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>   
   >>  wrote in message   
   >> news:r8clm8t5toud81cck6a995365sal1v2vbt@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 15:42:29 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 07:14:08 -0500, ozarkheart@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:29:42 +1000, "Dechucka"   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> snip   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> IOW, you are discussing something with no personal experience,   
   >>>>>>> simply   
   >>>>>>> regurgitating things you have read.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> How do you know?>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Feel free to cite your experience. I will believe whatever you post.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And, one step further, you can think of only one situation -  the   
   >>>>>>> one   
   >>>>>>> ***you create*** - and refuse to recognize there are other   
   >>>>>>> possibilities.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> as you have not come up with a plausible scenario for making the tank   
   >>>>>> inoperable these possibilities seem improberable   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Sure: Tank crew member stumbling down the street after a night on the   
   >>>>> town. They pass by a dark alley.....   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There's one possible scenario.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So now it's Jack the Ripper stopping an Abrams tank?   
   >>>   
   >>> Kill the crew - the tank stops   
   >>   
   >> What a brilliant strategy makes the tank rather redundant if you can just   
   >> kill the crew with a .22. What a waste of money by all those countries   
   >> buying tanks. You're lucky Saddam didn't know about your brilliant   
   >> tactics   
   >> as it may of changed the result of the Iraq invasion   
   >   
   > I guess you missed the bit where the Yanks had to restrict their tanks   
   > from urban areas if they didn't have close infantry support...   
      
   Possibly more to do with RPGs than .22s?   
      
   > Oh, that's right... you weren't there.   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)