17d15ef4   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: wy_@myself.com   
      
   On 16 Apr, 18:03, RD Sandman    
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   > >> If you don't wish to discuss it and consider the other side of the   
   > >> argument, that is your choice.  However, the Supreme Court has ruled,   
   > >> and, IMHO, gotten it right.   
   >   
   > > Well, of course it's gotten it right for you because you're a right   
   > > wingnut who's totally satisfied by a razor-thin partisan win of 5-4.   
   >   
   > I am an independent and not long ago a registered Democrat.   
      
   Funny.  You don't think and write like one.   
      
      
   >   
   > > But a partisan ruling in and of itself is not a valid ruling.  If the   
   > > same make up of the court of 5 conservatives and 4 liberals had 2   
   > > liberals and 3 conservatives voting in favor for the same 5-4 result,   
   > > then that could be viewed as a more objective opinion because it'd be   
   > > based on a certain common ground agreed upon by both sides, it would   
   > > cross the spectrum of views and not be restricted to just one view.   
   > > There is no common ground in how the SC has ruled on gun issues,   
   > > especially with the right dominating the bench, if only by 1 vote, and   
   > > voting in unison on it.   
   >   
   > Cry......cry.....cry.....   
      
   See?  I told you.  You don't think and write like one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)